Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
jleipart
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
Ken Wright
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

Only by making use of merged cells, and no-one I know has a good word to say
about merged cells, so from my perspective, no.

--
Regards
Ken....................... Microsoft MVP - Excel
Sys Spec - Win XP Pro / XL 97/00/02/03

------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission :-)
------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------


"jleipart" wrote in message
...
Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart



  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
Elkar
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

Wow... I'm actually quite surprised at this response.

Merged Cells can be very useful for creating design layout. Yes, I'll admit
that if you're doing a lot of calculations and range-work, then they can make
things a bit more tricky. But that is hardly reason to dismiss their use.

I use them quite often when desinging forms, and have no complaints. I will
agree that they should not be used on worksheets designed solely for data
storage and calculation. But if you're concerned about layout (especially
for print jobs), I don't see how you can go without merged cells.

Anyway, it does come down to what you want to be able to accomplish. If
appearance matters, then by all means, use merged cells.

Just my 2 cents.
Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

Only by making use of merged cells, and no-one I know has a good word to say
about merged cells, so from my perspective, no.

--
Regards
Ken....................... Microsoft MVP - Excel
Sys Spec - Win XP Pro / XL 97/00/02/03

------------------------------Â*------------------------------Â*----------------
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission :-)
------------------------------Â*------------------------------Â*----------------


"jleipart" wrote in message
...
Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart




  #4   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
Ken Wright
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

They screw up formula referencing and copy / paste functionality to name but
a few. Most of us tend to use spreadsheets as calculation engines, and i
don't want merged cells anywhere nearby. Just a personal preference, but
one that has been echoed by many of the regulars in here as result of
experience. If the use you put Excel to causes you no problems then great,
but in most cases merged cell functionality can be replaced using Format /
cells / alignment / Horizontal / center across range with no impact to
referencing etc.

Regards
Ken....................


"Elkar" wrote in message
...
Wow... I'm actually quite surprised at this response.

Merged Cells can be very useful for creating design layout. Yes, I'll
admit
that if you're doing a lot of calculations and range-work, then they can
make
things a bit more tricky. But that is hardly reason to dismiss their use.

I use them quite often when desinging forms, and have no complaints. I
will
agree that they should not be used on worksheets designed solely for data
storage and calculation. But if you're concerned about layout (especially
for print jobs), I don't see how you can go without merged cells.

Anyway, it does come down to what you want to be able to accomplish. If
appearance matters, then by all means, use merged cells.

Just my 2 cents.
Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

Only by making use of merged cells, and no-one I know has a good word to
say
about merged cells, so from my perspective, no.

--
Regards
Ken....................... Microsoft MVP - Excel
Sys Spec - Win XP Pro / XL 97/00/02/03

------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission :-)
------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------


"jleipart" wrote in message
...
Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart






  #5   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
Elkar
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

That is one of the beauties of Excel though, its versatility. It is capable
of so much more than being just a spreadsheet program. Merged Cells may have
no place in your work. Other aspects of Excel have little place in mine.
But I'd never suggest anything negative about them just because they don't
fit with what I use Excel for, or because I haven't taken the time to learn
how to use them.

I seem to remember getting into another unresolvable battle of opinions with
you before Ken, which I don't really wish to repeat. I wouldn't have even
responded in the first place, but a User came here looking for help, and your
response was basically, "No you can't, because I don't like it." Its just my
opinion, but I don't think that is a useful reply, nor one becoming of a
"Microsoft MVP".

Anyway, I shall just agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

They screw up formula referencing and copy / paste functionality to name but
a few. Most of us tend to use spreadsheets as calculation engines, and i
don't want merged cells anywhere nearby. Just a personal preference, but
one that has been echoed by many of the regulars in here as result of
experience. If the use you put Excel to causes you no problems then great,
but in most cases merged cell functionality can be replaced using Format /
cells / alignment / Horizontal / center across range with no impact to
referencing etc.

Regards
Ken....................


"Elkar" wrote in message
...
Wow... I'm actually quite surprised at this response.

Merged Cells can be very useful for creating design layout. Yes, I'll
admit
that if you're doing a lot of calculations and range-work, then they can
make
things a bit more tricky. But that is hardly reason to dismiss their use.

I use them quite often when desinging forms, and have no complaints. I
will
agree that they should not be used on worksheets designed solely for data
storage and calculation. But if you're concerned about layout (especially
for print jobs), I don't see how you can go without merged cells.

Anyway, it does come down to what you want to be able to accomplish. If
appearance matters, then by all means, use merged cells.

Just my 2 cents.
Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

Only by making use of merged cells, and no-one I know has a good word to
say
about merged cells, so from my perspective, no.

--
Regards
Ken....................... Microsoft MVP - Excel
Sys Spec - Win XP Pro / XL 97/00/02/03

------------------------------Â*------------------------------Â*----------------
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission :-)
------------------------------Â*------------------------------Â*----------------


"jleipart" wrote in message
...
Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart








  #6   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
Ken Wright
 
Posts: n/a
Default single table with columns that have different amounts of rows

I don't believe I said that at all. I pointed out that it could be done
with merged cells and simply expressed my distaste for them because of
issues they can cause, which is far better than sending someone off down a
road that may cause them grief with no warning. if they wish to use them
they are very free to do so.

Being an MVP doesn't mean I tell everyone that Excel is wonderful and omit
pointing out possible shortcomings by any means. Whatever it is capable of
being, the majority of people I deal with use it as what it was designed to
be, a spreadsheet, and hence my warning.

Regards
Ken.................

"Elkar" wrote in message
...
That is one of the beauties of Excel though, its versatility. It is
capable
of so much more than being just a spreadsheet program. Merged Cells may
have
no place in your work. Other aspects of Excel have little place in mine.
But I'd never suggest anything negative about them just because they don't
fit with what I use Excel for, or because I haven't taken the time to
learn
how to use them.

I seem to remember getting into another unresolvable battle of opinions
with
you before Ken, which I don't really wish to repeat. I wouldn't have even
responded in the first place, but a User came here looking for help, and
your
response was basically, "No you can't, because I don't like it." Its just
my
opinion, but I don't think that is a useful reply, nor one becoming of a
"Microsoft MVP".

Anyway, I shall just agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

They screw up formula referencing and copy / paste functionality to name
but
a few. Most of us tend to use spreadsheets as calculation engines, and i
don't want merged cells anywhere nearby. Just a personal preference, but
one that has been echoed by many of the regulars in here as result of
experience. If the use you put Excel to causes you no problems then
great,
but in most cases merged cell functionality can be replaced using Format
/
cells / alignment / Horizontal / center across range with no impact to
referencing etc.

Regards
Ken....................


"Elkar" wrote in message
...
Wow... I'm actually quite surprised at this response.

Merged Cells can be very useful for creating design layout. Yes, I'll
admit
that if you're doing a lot of calculations and range-work, then they
can
make
things a bit more tricky. But that is hardly reason to dismiss their
use.

I use them quite often when desinging forms, and have no complaints. I
will
agree that they should not be used on worksheets designed solely for
data
storage and calculation. But if you're concerned about layout
(especially
for print jobs), I don't see how you can go without merged cells.

Anyway, it does come down to what you want to be able to accomplish.
If
appearance matters, then by all means, use merged cells.

Just my 2 cents.
Elkar

"Ken Wright" wrote:

Only by making use of merged cells, and no-one I know has a good word
to
say
about merged cells, so from my perspective, no.

--
Regards
Ken....................... Microsoft MVP - Excel
Sys Spec - Win XP Pro / XL 97/00/02/03

------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission :-)
------------------------------*------------------------------*----------------


"jleipart" wrote in message
...
Is the above possible? If so, how can this be done?
Thank you in advance
--
jleipart








Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
updating pivot table to include additional rows Ellen Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 8 July 15th 08 01:33 PM
OLAP Pivot table - How to show items with no data ? Timmo Excel Worksheet Functions 1 March 30th 06 06:03 PM
pivot table - Can I pre-define rows and columns? WRBailey Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 3 May 17th 05 06:11 PM
Pivot Table Creating New Columns that Subtract Two Existing Columns den4673 Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 3 December 17th 04 01:31 PM
interchange columns with rows Herman Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 2 December 8th 04 05:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"