Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have noted that the .PDF output from Excel is not very good in certain
instances. In a number of special cases basic fills or patterns do not convert well. For example, we have a number of spreadsheets that use thin diagonal stripped and gray screen (12%) pattern fills to highlight certain cells. However, when these worksheets are published to a .PDF file, the patterns are grossly enlarged and present themselves as thick diagonal lines or as large polka dots. The refinement of the original fills is completely lost. This is odd, given that many other meticulous attributes remain intact during the conversion. Does anyone have a recommendation as to how we can preserve the quality of the fill patterns when publishing to a .PDF file? Is there an Excel option or a .PDF printing option that might control this aspect of the conversion? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor humaneyes | New Users to Excel | |||
Poor humaneyes | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Poor humaneyes | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Poor humaneyes | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Poor humaneyes | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |