LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.newusers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 113
Default Poor .PDF conversion

We have noted that the .PDF output from Excel is not very good in certain
instances. In a number of special cases basic fills or patterns do not
convert well. For example, we have a number of spreadsheets that use thin
diagonal stripped and gray screen (12%) pattern fills to highlight certain
cells. However, when these worksheets are published to a .PDF file, the
patterns are grossly enlarged and present themselves as thick diagonal lines
or as large polka dots. The refinement of the original fills is completely
lost.

This is odd, given that many other meticulous attributes remain intact
during the conversion. Does anyone have a recommendation as to how we can
preserve the quality of the fill patterns when publishing to a .PDF file?
Is there an Excel option or a .PDF printing option that might control this
aspect of the conversion?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor humaneyes *«Ë²´* New Users to Excel 0 August 23rd 07 06:26 AM
Poor humaneyes *«Ë²´* Excel Worksheet Functions 0 August 23rd 07 05:08 AM
Poor humaneyes *«Ë²´* Excel Worksheet Functions 0 August 23rd 07 05:08 AM
Poor humaneyes *«Ë²´* Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 August 23rd 07 05:08 AM
Poor humaneyes *«Ë²´* Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 August 23rd 07 05:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"