![]() |
comparing componants of tables
I cannot easily compare data elements of comparative data. Here's
what I mean, john smith observation 1 observation 2 weight 160 155 belt size 40 38 shoe size 12 11 bill jones observation 1 observation 2 weight 128 119 belt size 29 28 shoe size 8 9 mary Dee observation 1 observation 2 weight 120 129 belt size 25 26 shoe size 8 9 But, I have many rows of these comparative data, and I have many subjects. I end up cutting and pasting each pair of cells so the look like, observation 1 observation 2 John smith |
comparing componants of tables
jimbo, I have to make several assumptions to provide this solution.
First assumption: that in the source table, the columns for observations are the same for all columns for each person. That is, you could have just had observation 1 observation 2 in the first row of the table and left those titles out of the entry rows for the others like bill jones and mary Dee. Second assumption, when you do comparisons, you're wanting to compare one category for 2 or more people. That is you always want to compare weights to weights, and not weight for one person to belt size for someone else. I've also assumed, for the purpose of the formula I'll give you, that your table goes from A1 over and down to C14. For the 'solution' comparison table, we need to set up a similar table, but where you have a person's name in the first row of a group, we put the category, and instead of categories below it, we put the names of the people to compare values from that category to. My first group starts at A17 and looks like this: A B C 17 belt size observation 1 observation 2 18 bill jones 29 28 19 john smith 40 38 Here is the basic formula that I placed into cell B18 of this comparison group. Remember that this is a formula and it is typed in as a continuous entry, it doesn't have the line breaks that this board may force into it. =INDEX($A$1:$C$14,MATCH($A18,$A$1:$A$14,0)+MATCH($ A$17,OFFSET($A$1:$A$14,MATCH($A18,$A$1:$A$14,0),0) ,0),MATCH(B$17,$A$1:$C$1,0)) This formula can then be filled to the right and down and will adjust automatically for the columns/rows it is filled into and give you the values for the category listed in the upper left cell of it (A17) for all names listed in the rows below that category (A18 and A19). Here are some more explanations of what the various address ranges in the formula refer to: $A$1:$C$14 is the entire source table range from the upper left corner cell to the lower right corner cell $A$1:$A$14 is the entire list of the source table in column a, with the names and categories $A$1:$C$1 is the first row of the source table (includes the name plus all "observation #" entries $A$17 is the cell in this comparison group holding the name of the category values to be compared $A$18 refers to the cell on the row for the formula with the person's name in it Remember, there is almost always HelpFrom (at) jlathamsite.com if you need further explanation. "jimbo" wrote: I cannot easily compare data elements of comparative data. Here's what I mean, john smith observation 1 observation 2 weight 160 155 belt size 40 38 shoe size 12 11 bill jones observation 1 observation 2 weight 128 119 belt size 29 28 shoe size 8 9 mary Dee observation 1 observation 2 weight 120 129 belt size 25 26 shoe size 8 9 But, I have many rows of these comparative data, and I have many subjects. I end up cutting and pasting each pair of cells so the look like, observation 1 observation 2 John smith |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com