![]() |
Logic Test ?
In Excel A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011
B1=1.2664-1.2653=.0011 Ask A1=B1, result is False; why? |
Logic Test ?
hi Zeno,
try to use round to see it as true the results of the formula a a1 = 0,0011000000000001 b1 = 0,0010999999999998 so they are not equal. use =round((1.2675-1.2664),4) and =round((1.2664-1.2653),4) hth regards from Brazil Marcelo "Zeno" escreveu: In Excel A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011 B1=1.2664-1.2653=.0011 Ask A1=B1, result is False; why? |
Logic Test ?
If
A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011 = FALSE B1=1.2664-1.2653=.0011 = FALSE A1=B1 = [FALSE = FALSE] = TRUE if A1=1.2675-1.2664 B1=1.2664-1.2653 A1=B1 = [.0011 = .0011] = FALSE "Zeno" wrote: In Excel A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011 Ask A1=B1, result is False; why? |
Logic Test ?
"Zeno" wrote in message
... In Excel A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011 B1=1.2664-1.2653=.0011 Ask A1=B1, result is False; why? Because these numbers can't be represented exactly in binary. http://www.cpearson.com/excel/rounding.htm -- David Biddulph |
Logic Test ?
The math (and logic) is exactly right, given unavoidable approximations to
the original numbers. Most terminating decimal fractions (including .2675 .2774 .2653 and .0011) are nonterminating binary fractions that can only be approximated, much as 1/3 can only be approximated as a decimal number. You are seeing the binary equivalent of 2/3 - 1/3 = 0.6667 - 0.3333 = 0.3334 < 0.3333 As documented in Excel's Help for "Excel specifications and limits" subtopic "Calculation specifications", the approximations used may not be exact beyond 15 digits. You cancelled 3 of those 15 digits in the subtraction, revealing residue of the original approximations. You can use the D2D function at http://groups.google.com/group/micro...06871cf92f8465 To see the actual decimal values of the approximations involved. Jerry "Zeno" wrote: In Excel A1=1.2675-1.2664=.0011 B1=1.2664-1.2653=.0011 Ask A1=B1, result is False; why? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com