![]() |
dsum returns 0 if criteria range too large
I have a worksheet that lists jobs with various identifying number ranges
differentiated by a preceding letter. E.G. C10000 through C90000 and U10000 through U90000. I am tyring to get subtotals on different fields for the types of jobs we have in house. When I use a criteria range U10000 in one column and U100000 in the next it returns "-" (result field is set up in the accounting number format, else this would be zero) If I use U95000 in the second column I get the correct and expected result. Can anyone tell my why the higher limit is causing this problem. I have also seen this in the C criteria. Thanks. |
dsum returns 0 if criteria range too large
Sorry, meant to write U10000 in first column of criteria and <U100000 in
second column. Works fine if I use <U95000 in the second column. Sorry for any confusion. "JT Spitz" wrote: I have a worksheet that lists jobs with various identifying number ranges differentiated by a preceding letter. E.G. C10000 through C90000 and U10000 through U90000. I am tyring to get subtotals on different fields for the types of jobs we have in house. When I use a criteria range U10000 in one column and U100000 in the next it returns "-" (result field is set up in the accounting number format, else this would be zero) If I use U95000 in the second column I get the correct and expected result. Can anyone tell my why the higher limit is causing this problem. I have also seen this in the C criteria. Thanks. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com