Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi:
I have a small data set, and I'm trying to do make some forecasting functions work, so I use the INTERCEPT() and SLOPE() function in order to get the line's major elements. BUT! When I double check the INTERCEPT() and SLOPE() results with the Trendline that Excel has done using the data set, I get completely different values for the INTERCEPT! Any advice out there on how to handle this?? My data set follows 2007 2008 2009 2010 A 195,734.53 211,970.79 229,935.20 249,846.68 B 57,893.65 66,527.44 76,613.14 88,412.49 So the equation from the graph/trendline function: A: y = 18030x + 176797; and B: y = 10164x + 46951.. The SLOPE() function is fine and I get matching values, but my INTERCEPT() values are way off: -35,991,552.05 for A; -20,342,474.73 for B. Thanks! |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The devil is in the details, and you've left out one important detail: what are you using for known_x? The intercept, of course, is the value of y when x=0. If I use "2007, 2008, 2009, 2010" for known_x, I get the same from INTERCEPT as your worksheet got. In this case, known_x refers to "years since 1 BC" (ie 1 BC is year 0). If I use "1, 2, 3, 4" for known_x, I get the same from INTERCEPT as your chart trendline gave. In this case, known_x refers to "years since 2006" (ie 2006 is year 0). As long as you're consistent in your use of independent variable, neither is necessarily more correct than the other. -- MrShorty ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrShorty's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php...o&userid=22181 View this thread: http://www.excelforum.com/showthread...hreadid=507461 |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Misha -
If you have a Line chart type, Excel uses 1,2,3,... for the X values of the trendline. If you create an XY (Scatter) chart, you should obtain identical results for the linear trendline and the worksheet functions. - Mike www.mikemiddleton.com "Misha" wrote in message oups.com... Hi: I have a small data set, and I'm trying to do make some forecasting functions work, so I use the INTERCEPT() and SLOPE() function in order to get the line's major elements. BUT! When I double check the INTERCEPT() and SLOPE() results with the Trendline that Excel has done using the data set, I get completely different values for the INTERCEPT! Any advice out there on how to handle this?? My data set follows 2007 2008 2009 2010 A 195,734.53 211,970.79 229,935.20 249,846.68 B 57,893.65 66,527.44 76,613.14 88,412.49 So the equation from the graph/trendline function: A: y = 18030x + 176797; and B: y = 10164x + 46951.. The SLOPE() function is fine and I get matching values, but my INTERCEPT() values are way off: -35,991,552.05 for A; -20,342,474.73 for B. Thanks! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a nested Address function for a reference | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Date & Time | New Users to Excel | |||
Hyperlinks using R[1]C[1] and offset function in its cell referenc | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Conversion | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
HOW CAN I GET OFFICE 2003 EXCEL BASIC TO NEST FUNCTIONS LIKE EXCE. | Excel Worksheet Functions |