![]() |
Function WEEKNUM does not show correct result for 15.2.2005
As a result Excel 2003 shows 8 (week number) for 15.2.2005, but the correct
result is 7. For Year 2004 the answer is correct. -- Edward |
Hi Edward
See my site and chip's site for information about this http://www.rondebruin.nl/weeknumber.htm -- Regards Ron de Bruin http://www.rondebruin.nl "Edward" wrote in message ... As a result Excel 2003 shows 8 (week number) for 15.2.2005, but the correct result is 7. For Year 2004 the answer is correct. -- Edward |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:55:04 -0800, Edward
wrote: As a result Excel 2003 shows 8 (week number) for 15.2.2005, but the correct result is 7. For Year 2004 the answer is correct. Actually, if you read the documentation in HELP, you will see that the Excel WEEKNUM function does NOT give the ISO week number, which is probably what you are expecting. So to talk about "correct" you must first define what your standards are. WEEKNUM in Excel does give the "correct" answer -- at least it complies with it's own definition which is NOT the SAME definition as the ISO standard. If you want to obtain an ISO compliant week number, I think the easiest way is to use either a VBA User Defined Function or, if you have Longre's morefunc.xll add-in, you can use his ISO.WEEKNUM function. Below is a VBA routine. To enter it, <alt-F11 opens the VB Editor. Ensure your project is highlighted in the project explorer window, then Insert/Module and paste the code below into the window that opens. You can then use =isoweeknum(date) in your workbook. ================================ Function ISOWeeknum(dt As Date) As Integer ISOWeeknum = DatePart("ww", dt, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) If ISOWeeknum 52 Then If DatePart("ww", dt + 7, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) = 2 Then ISOWeeknum = 1 End If End If End Function =============================== --ron |
For the OP: See also the function on my site that don't need the UDF
-- Regards Ron de Bruin http://www.rondebruin.nl "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:55:04 -0800, Edward wrote: As a result Excel 2003 shows 8 (week number) for 15.2.2005, but the correct result is 7. For Year 2004 the answer is correct. Actually, if you read the documentation in HELP, you will see that the Excel WEEKNUM function does NOT give the ISO week number, which is probably what you are expecting. So to talk about "correct" you must first define what your standards are. WEEKNUM in Excel does give the "correct" answer -- at least it complies with it's own definition which is NOT the SAME definition as the ISO standard. If you want to obtain an ISO compliant week number, I think the easiest way is to use either a VBA User Defined Function or, if you have Longre's morefunc.xll add-in, you can use his ISO.WEEKNUM function. Below is a VBA routine. To enter it, <alt-F11 opens the VB Editor. Ensure your project is highlighted in the project explorer window, then Insert/Module and paste the code below into the window that opens. You can then use =isoweeknum(date) in your workbook. ================================ Function ISOWeeknum(dt As Date) As Integer ISOWeeknum = DatePart("ww", dt, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) If ISOWeeknum 52 Then If DatePart("ww", dt + 7, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) = 2 Then ISOWeeknum = 1 End If End If End Function =============================== --ron |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:28:21 +0100, "Ron de Bruin"
wrote: For the OP: See also the function on my site that don't need the UDF Your function works perfectly, of course. I was just putting forth a different method. Since calculation speed is not an issue for me when using this function, I personally prefer having a UDF in my personal.xla addin file; because it's easier for me to remember a function like =ISOWEEKNUM(dt) than the equivalent formula. But certainly my "preference" is not meant to imply that it is any better than any other approach, except for satisfying my own personal bias. Best wishes, --ron |
Hi Ron
The problem is if you use the UDF that if you send the workbook to someone else you must add the UDF to the workbook. Norman I am making a new Add-in on this moment that insert formulas in data tables and we choose not to use ATP and UDF's because of this problem and also the international problem with ATP. -- Regards Ron de Bruin http://www.rondebruin.nl "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:28:21 +0100, "Ron de Bruin" wrote: For the OP: See also the function on my site that don't need the UDF Your function works perfectly, of course. I was just putting forth a different method. Since calculation speed is not an issue for me when using this function, I personally prefer having a UDF in my personal.xla addin file; because it's easier for me to remember a function like =ISOWEEKNUM(dt) than the equivalent formula. But certainly my "preference" is not meant to imply that it is any better than any other approach, except for satisfying my own personal bias. Best wishes, --ron |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:43:03 +0100, "Ron de Bruin"
wrote: The problem is if you use the UDF that if you send the workbook to someone else you must add the UDF to the workbook. Is that hard to do? I thought if one added the UDF to the workbook, it would be saved along with the workbook. --ron |
Hi Ron
1) What if people send only one sheet. 2) what if they want to use it in a other workbook Most people don't know how to copy a UDF in a module 3)what if they copy it in there personal.xls(like you) With the Add-in we try to make it easy to insert the formulas in a sheet We have no problems then we hope<g Also we not use the weeknum functions but others because as you know it will not translate the weeknum function to a other language. Also the Text function you can't use international Y for year is in Dutch j for example -- Regards Ron de Bruin http://www.rondebruin.nl "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:43:03 +0100, "Ron de Bruin" wrote: The problem is if you use the UDF that if you send the workbook to someone else you must add the UDF to the workbook. Is that hard to do? I thought if one added the UDF to the workbook, it would be saved along with the workbook. --ron |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:47:37 +0100, "Ron de Bruin"
wrote: Hi Ron 1) What if people send only one sheet. 2) what if they want to use it in a other workbook Most people don't know how to copy a UDF in a module 3)what if they copy it in there personal.xls(like you) With the Add-in we try to make it easy to insert the formulas in a sheet We have no problems then we hope<g Also we not use the weeknum functions but others because as you know it will not translate the weeknum function to a other language. Also the Text function you can't use international Y for year is in Dutch j for example All good points. Just a different approach. --ron |
The script works perfect, Thanks
Edward "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote: On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:55:04 -0800, Edward wrote: As a result Excel 2003 shows 8 (week number) for 15.2.2005, but the correct result is 7. For Year 2004 the answer is correct. Actually, if you read the documentation in HELP, you will see that the Excel WEEKNUM function does NOT give the ISO week number, which is probably what you are expecting. So to talk about "correct" you must first define what your standards are. WEEKNUM in Excel does give the "correct" answer -- at least it complies with it's own definition which is NOT the SAME definition as the ISO standard. If you want to obtain an ISO compliant week number, I think the easiest way is to use either a VBA User Defined Function or, if you have Longre's morefunc.xll add-in, you can use his ISO.WEEKNUM function. Below is a VBA routine. To enter it, <alt-F11 opens the VB Editor. Ensure your project is highlighted in the project explorer window, then Insert/Module and paste the code below into the window that opens. You can then use =isoweeknum(date) in your workbook. ================================ Function ISOWeeknum(dt As Date) As Integer ISOWeeknum = DatePart("ww", dt, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) If ISOWeeknum 52 Then If DatePart("ww", dt + 7, vbMonday, vbFirstFourDays) = 2 Then ISOWeeknum = 1 End If End If End Function =============================== --ron |
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:07:04 -0800, Edward wrote:
The script works perfect, Thanks Edward You're welcome. Thanks for the feedback. --ron |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com