Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello. Thanks for reading my question. My problem is directly related to
Excel 2003's column limitation of 256. Situation: I have the following array formula in a cell, which counts the number of numerical entries that occur three times in the range from A1:IV1 .... =SUM(IF(COUNTIF($A1:$IV1,$A1:$IV1)=3,1,0))/3. The formula is replicated downward for 1,000 rows. This works fine. I have several sets of these one thousand blocks of numbers (separated by blank rows), and therein comes my pain. The second block of cells begins at A2000. I now need to count two rows to see how many "three occurrences" there are in ( A1:IV1, A2000:IV2000........B2:IV2,A2001:IV2001......) . In other words, I want the formula to 'see' these two ranges as one, if possible. I cannot simply apply the formula to the second block of cell rows because, as an example, a number might occur "two times" in A1:IV1 and "one time" in A2000:IV2000 and would not get counted in the sum. Thank you. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What is the limitation of formula memory for Office XP - Excel XP? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Formula Cell color limitation | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Formula Req'd - Autofilter limitation workaround | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Bypassing the 128MB formula memory limitation in 2002? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel Limitation | Excel Worksheet Functions |