Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi I need some help please. I am trying to figure out how much interest I
save if I pay off a loan early. for example I have a loan for 125,000. interest is 6.5% for 5 years. I know how much interest I will pay in the first year which is 6,767.40. What is the formula if I pay this off in 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, or 4 years? Thank you! SC |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 9:06 am, SEC wrote:
hi I need some help please. I am trying to figure out how much interest I save if I pay off a loan early. for example I have a loan for 125,000. interest is 6.5% for 5 years. I know how much interest I will pay in the first year which is 6,767.40. What is the formula if I pay this off in 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, or 4 years? This is kinda like trying to answer the question "Are you still beating your wife?". It is difficult to answer a question that includes an incorrect assertion or inference in the first place. Ostensibly, one answer to your question is to use CUMIPMT(). See the Help page for usage and what to do if you get a #NAME error. For example, for periods 13 through 24 (year 2): =-cumipmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, 125000, 13, 24, 0) Alternatively, you can use standard functions as follows. The periodic payment might be computed in A1 as [1]: =pmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, -125000) Then the following computes the amount of interest between periods 13 through 24 (year 2), written more complicatedly than necessary so that you can see where to substitute any starting and ending period numbers: =$A$1*(24 - 13 + 1) - fv(6.5%/12, 13 - 1, $A$1, -125000) + fv(6.5%/12, 24, $A$1, -125000) However, that begs the question: how did you determine that 6767.40 is the amount of interest paid in the first year? It would appear that CUMIPMT() was used with type 1 instead of type 0 in the last argument. In other words, the type "payment at the beginning". But I believe CUMIPMT() with type 1 works incorrectly [2]. Alternatively, perhaps 6767.40 was computed from an amortization schedule that makes the same mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes. (CUMIPMT() with type 0 works fine.) In any case, I doubt that the loan would be structured as "payment at the beginning". It is disadvantageous to both the lender, who would earn less interest for the full term of the loan, and to the borrower, who effectively receives a smaller loan. Don't confuse "payment on the first of the month" with "payment at the beginning of each period". That is why I use type 0 (payment at the end) above. Thus, the amount of interest for the first year is 7481.12 (7481.14 in real life), not 6767.40. HTH. ----- Endnotes: [1] Normally, I round the result of PMT() to the smallest coin of the realm (e.g. cent in the US). That is correct in the real world. But I eschew rounding here so that the result of the second formula matches the CUMIPMT() result (within about 3E-10) to minimize confusion. In your example, the difference is less than 0.11 after 5 years. [2] The mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes is to assume that interest is zero in the first period, and interest is computed in arrears for subsequent periods. Although that might seem to make some sense, it is inconsistent with both Excel FV() and the HP 12C calculator when "payment at the beginning" is chosen. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Joe,
That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer. This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default . it is based on a amortization schedule since I had to figure out the formula for a five year payment schedule then the interest, principal amt, and remaining balance after each year. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. here is the table of the pymt summary: Payment Summary Principal Paid Interest Paid Remaining Principal After 1 Year $22,423.71 $6,767.40 $102,576.29 After 2 Years $45,630.63 $12,751.58 $79,369.37 After 3 Years $70,391.77 $17,181.54 $54,608.23 After 4 Years $96,811.21 $19,953.21 $28,188.79 After 5 Years $125,000.00 $20,955.52 ($0.00) this is the table I need to figure out how compute the interest savings. Thanks! sec "joeu2004" wrote: On Nov 20, 9:06 am, SEC wrote: hi I need some help please. I am trying to figure out how much interest I save if I pay off a loan early. for example I have a loan for 125,000. interest is 6.5% for 5 years. I know how much interest I will pay in the first year which is 6,767.40. What is the formula if I pay this off in 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, or 4 years? This is kinda like trying to answer the question "Are you still beating your wife?". It is difficult to answer a question that includes an incorrect assertion or inference in the first place. Ostensibly, one answer to your question is to use CUMIPMT(). See the Help page for usage and what to do if you get a #NAME error. For example, for periods 13 through 24 (year 2): =-cumipmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, 125000, 13, 24, 0) Alternatively, you can use standard functions as follows. The periodic payment might be computed in A1 as [1]: =pmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, -125000) Then the following computes the amount of interest between periods 13 through 24 (year 2), written more complicatedly than necessary so that you can see where to substitute any starting and ending period numbers: =$A$1*(24 - 13 + 1) - fv(6.5%/12, 13 - 1, $A$1, -125000) + fv(6.5%/12, 24, $A$1, -125000) However, that begs the question: how did you determine that 6767.40 is the amount of interest paid in the first year? It would appear that CUMIPMT() was used with type 1 instead of type 0 in the last argument. In other words, the type "payment at the beginning". But I believe CUMIPMT() with type 1 works incorrectly [2]. Alternatively, perhaps 6767.40 was computed from an amortization schedule that makes the same mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes. (CUMIPMT() with type 0 works fine.) In any case, I doubt that the loan would be structured as "payment at the beginning". It is disadvantageous to both the lender, who would earn less interest for the full term of the loan, and to the borrower, who effectively receives a smaller loan. Don't confuse "payment on the first of the month" with "payment at the beginning of each period". That is why I use type 0 (payment at the end) above. Thus, the amount of interest for the first year is 7481.12 (7481.14 in real life), not 6767.40. HTH. ----- Endnotes: [1] Normally, I round the result of PMT() to the smallest coin of the realm (e.g. cent in the US). That is correct in the real world. But I eschew rounding here so that the result of the second formula matches the CUMIPMT() result (within about 3E-10) to minimize confusion. In your example, the difference is less than 0.11 after 5 years. [2] The mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes is to assume that interest is zero in the first period, and interest is computed in arrears for subsequent periods. Although that might seem to make some sense, it is inconsistent with both Excel FV() and the HP 12C calculator when "payment at the beginning" is chosen. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer.
This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default . it is based on a amortization schedule since I had to figure out the formula for a five year payment schedule then the interest, principal amt, and remaining balance after each year. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. here is the table of the pymt summary: Payment Summary Principal Paid Interest Paid Remaining Principal After 1 Year $22,423.71 $6,767.40 $102,576.29 After 2 Years $45,630.63 $12,751.58 $79,369.37 After 3 Years $70,391.77 $17,181.54 $54,608.23 After 4 Years $96,811.21 $19,953.21 $28,188.79 After 5 Years $125,000.00 $20,955.52 ($0.00) this is the table I need to figure out how compute the interest savings. Thanks! sec "joeu2004" wrote: On Nov 20, 9:06 am, SEC wrote: hi I need some help please. I am trying to figure out how much interest I save if I pay off a loan early. for example I have a loan for 125,000. interest is 6.5% for 5 years. I know how much interest I will pay in the first year which is 6,767.40. What is the formula if I pay this off in 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, or 4 years? This is kinda like trying to answer the question "Are you still beating your wife?". It is difficult to answer a question that includes an incorrect assertion or inference in the first place. Ostensibly, one answer to your question is to use CUMIPMT(). See the Help page for usage and what to do if you get a #NAME error. For example, for periods 13 through 24 (year 2): =-cumipmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, 125000, 13, 24, 0) Alternatively, you can use standard functions as follows. The periodic payment might be computed in A1 as [1]: =pmt(6.5%/12, 5*12, -125000) Then the following computes the amount of interest between periods 13 through 24 (year 2), written more complicatedly than necessary so that you can see where to substitute any starting and ending period numbers: =$A$1*(24 - 13 + 1) - fv(6.5%/12, 13 - 1, $A$1, -125000) + fv(6.5%/12, 24, $A$1, -125000) However, that begs the question: how did you determine that 6767.40 is the amount of interest paid in the first year? It would appear that CUMIPMT() was used with type 1 instead of type 0 in the last argument. In other words, the type "payment at the beginning". But I believe CUMIPMT() with type 1 works incorrectly [2]. Alternatively, perhaps 6767.40 was computed from an amortization schedule that makes the same mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes. (CUMIPMT() with type 0 works fine.) In any case, I doubt that the loan would be structured as "payment at the beginning". It is disadvantageous to both the lender, who would earn less interest for the full term of the loan, and to the borrower, who effectively receives a smaller loan. Don't confuse "payment on the first of the month" with "payment at the beginning of each period". That is why I use type 0 (payment at the end) above. Thus, the amount of interest for the first year is 7481.12 (7481.14 in real life), not 6767.40. HTH. ----- Endnotes: [1] Normally, I round the result of PMT() to the smallest coin of the realm (e.g. cent in the US). That is correct in the real world. But I eschew rounding here so that the result of the second formula matches the CUMIPMT() result (within about 3E-10) to minimize confusion. In your example, the difference is less than 0.11 after 5 years. [2] The mistake that CUMIPMT() with type 1 makes is to assume that interest is zero in the first period, and interest is computed in arrears for subsequent periods. Although that might seem to make some sense, it is inconsistent with both Excel FV() and the HP 12C calculator when "payment at the beginning" is chosen. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 21, 6:18 am, SEC wrote:
That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer. This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default. it is based on a amortization schedule Okay. If the instructor gave you the amortization schedule or the explicit formulas for computing it (not just general directions), stick with that, of course. But if you are responsible for the amortization schedule, IMHO, it is incorrect when payments are made at the beginning of the period. The error is understandable if you used CUMIPMT() and CUMPRINC() in the table. IMHO, they return the incorrect result for the "beginning of period" type. For your edification, compare the following first-year results: =-cumprinc(6.5%/12, 60, 125000, 1, 12, 1) =125000 - fv(6.5%/12, 12, pmt(6.5%/12, 60, -125000, 0, 1), -125000, 1) See my previous posting for the explanation of the error. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. If I understand you correctly, you want to add a column that indicates the amount of interest saved after each year. As always, there are many ways to do this. The simplest might be: put the following into E2 and copy down through E6 (assuming that Interest Paid is in column C with values starting in C2): =$C$6 - C2 In your table, C6 is the total interest paid for the full term of the loan, and C2 is the interest paid through the end of that year. When you copy the formula down, you will see that C2 changes (C3, C4, etc), whereas $C$6 stays the same. This demonstrates the difference between relative and absolute references. ----- original posting ----- On Nov 21, 6:18 am, SEC wrote: That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer. This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default . it is based on a amortization schedule since I had to figure out the formula for a five year payment schedule then the interest, principal amt, and remaining balance after each year. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. here is the table of the pymt summary: Payment Summary Principal Paid Interest Paid Remaining Principal After 1 Year $22,423.71 $6,767.40 $102,576.29 After 2 Years $45,630.63 $12,751.58 $79,369.37 After 3 Years $70,391.77 $17,181.54 $54,608.23 After 4 Years $96,811.21 $19,953.21 $28,188.79 After 5 Years $125,000.00 $20,955.52 ($0.00) this is the table I need to figure out how compute the interest savings. Thanks! sec |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that was is it!!! I get the complicated PPMT and IPMT formulas right and a
simple one like that I couldnt figure it out. Thanks so much Joe!!! "joeu2004" wrote: On Nov 21, 6:18 am, SEC wrote: That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer. This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default. it is based on a amortization schedule Okay. If the instructor gave you the amortization schedule or the explicit formulas for computing it (not just general directions), stick with that, of course. But if you are responsible for the amortization schedule, IMHO, it is incorrect when payments are made at the beginning of the period. The error is understandable if you used CUMIPMT() and CUMPRINC() in the table. IMHO, they return the incorrect result for the "beginning of period" type. For your edification, compare the following first-year results: =-cumprinc(6.5%/12, 60, 125000, 1, 12, 1) =125000 - fv(6.5%/12, 12, pmt(6.5%/12, 60, -125000, 0, 1), -125000, 1) See my previous posting for the explanation of the error. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. If I understand you correctly, you want to add a column that indicates the amount of interest saved after each year. As always, there are many ways to do this. The simplest might be: put the following into E2 and copy down through E6 (assuming that Interest Paid is in column C with values starting in C2): =$C$6 - C2 In your table, C6 is the total interest paid for the full term of the loan, and C2 is the interest paid through the end of that year. When you copy the formula down, you will see that C2 changes (C3, C4, etc), whereas $C$6 stays the same. This demonstrates the difference between relative and absolute references. ----- original posting ----- On Nov 21, 6:18 am, SEC wrote: That helped me understand it however, Im not coming up with the right answer. This isn't a real life situation. Its an excel problem. Instructor wanted us to use beginning of loan rather then end which is the default . it is based on a amortization schedule since I had to figure out the formula for a five year payment schedule then the interest, principal amt, and remaining balance after each year. The last set of instructions is where I am stuck at. which is to find out how much interest is saved if loan is paid out after 1st of year, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. here is the table of the pymt summary: Payment Summary Principal Paid Interest Paid Remaining Principal After 1 Year $22,423.71 $6,767.40 $102,576.29 After 2 Years $45,630.63 $12,751.58 $79,369.37 After 3 Years $70,391.77 $17,181.54 $54,608.23 After 4 Years $96,811.21 $19,953.21 $28,188.79 After 5 Years $125,000.00 $20,955.52 ($0.00) this is the table I need to figure out how compute the interest savings. Thanks! sec |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Constant loan payments vs. constant payments of principal | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
biweekly payments on a loan using Pmt function | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
loan payments - Interest only? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Add insurance to loan payments | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
How do you set up a loan using the loan calculator w/odd payments. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |