Thanks!
 

Both work! Now the real problem...which one to use!?!
Thanks again

KSL

Thanks!
 

What earthly use is that post? You haven't replied to an existing post, but
instead you've started a new thread. You haven't quoted anything to which
you might be replying. How is anyone supposed to know what you're talking
about?
--
David Biddulph

"Leonhardtk" wrote in message
...
Both work! Now the real problem...which one to use!?!
Thanks again

KSL

[OT] Thanks!
 

What's the difference? ;) The guy is happy, wants to thank for help he
received and he just forgot about such unimportant thing... ;)

--
Piotrek

What earthly use is that post? You haven't replied to an existing post,
but instead you've started a new thread. You haven't quoted anything to
which you might be replying. How is anyone supposed to know what you're
talking about?

Both work! Now the real problem...which one to use!?!
Thanks again

[OT] Thanks!
 

"Piotrek" wrote...
What's the difference? ;) The guy is happy, wants to thank for help he
received and he just forgot about such unimportant thing... ;)
....

If the OP just wants to thank world & dog in general, he could have done it
verbally and not posted anything. If the OP meant to thank specific
individuals, he went about it wrong.

[OT] Thanks!
 

What's the difference? ;) The guy is happy, wants to thank for help he
received and he just forgot about such unimportant thing... ;)

If the OP just wants to thank world & dog in general, he could have done
it verbally and not posted anything. If the OP meant to thank specific
individuals, he went about it wrong.

You are right of course :) But I guess both Elkar and T. Valko aka Biff
already know that "Thanks!" goes to them :)

--
Thanks again for solving my "Counting pairs" problem, Harlan
Piotrek

[OT] Thanks!
 

But I guess both Elkar and T. Valko aka Biff already know that "Thanks!"
goes to them :)

Don't drag me into this! <g

If I helped you you're quite welcome but I don't recall replying to a thread
by "Piotrek". I may have but I just don't remember (and I don't feel like
searching the archives for it!).


--
Biff
Microsoft Excel MVP


"Piotrek" wrote in message
...

What's the difference? ;) The guy is happy, wants to thank for help he
received and he just forgot about such unimportant thing... ;)

If the OP just wants to thank world & dog in general, he could have done
it verbally and not posted anything. If the OP meant to thank specific
individuals, he went about it wrong.

You are right of course :) But I guess both Elkar and T. Valko aka Biff
already know that "Thanks!" goes to them :)

--
Thanks again for solving my "Counting pairs" problem, Harlan
Piotrek

[OT] Thanks!
 

Oh, now I see what this is about.

Both work! Now the real problem...which one to use!?!

Well, I'm a little biased but....

The formula I suggested is shorter and uses less function calls. It can also
be expanded to more levels without using more function calls.


--
Biff
Microsoft Excel MVP


"T. Valko" wrote in message
...
But I guess both Elkar and T. Valko aka Biff already know that "Thanks!"
goes to them :)

Don't drag me into this! <g

If I helped you you're quite welcome but I don't recall replying to a
thread by "Piotrek". I may have but I just don't remember (and I don't
feel like searching the archives for it!).


--
Biff
Microsoft Excel MVP


"Piotrek" wrote in message
...

What's the difference? ;) The guy is happy, wants to thank for help he
received and he just forgot about such unimportant thing... ;)

If the OP just wants to thank world & dog in general, he could have done
it verbally and not posted anything. If the OP meant to thank specific
individuals, he went about it wrong.

You are right of course :) But I guess both Elkar and T. Valko aka Biff
already know that "Thanks!" goes to them :)

--
Thanks again for solving my "Counting pairs" problem, Harlan
Piotrek