Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading this MSDN article on MSDN titled "Improving Performance
in Excel 2007": http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730921.aspx and it prompted me to optimize my large spreadsheets (1000 rows by 50 columns, about 10 columns use INDEX/MATCH, and another 10 do simple mathematical calculations). Question #1: If I do an INDEX or MATCH on a specified range (i.e. A1:A1000) vs the entire column (A:A), is there a performance increase? By how much? And I'd imagine it wouldn't matter what the size of the INDEX function is since it just takes in a row & column number. Question #2: When would I use an array (CTRL-SHIFT-ENTER) when doing and INDEX(MATCH) lookup? Are there performance benefits? Question #3: The consensus seems to say that separating the MATCH function into a separate column before using it in a complex formula speeds things up. How true is this? And unfortunately my work uses Excel 2003, the article is geared towards Excel 2007, where the new IFERROR function would be of much use to me. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
index match array function-returning only first match, need last. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Performance compared to an index using XIRR | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
lookups and match | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
SUM of INDEX lookups | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Lookups vs Match | Excel Worksheet Functions |