![]() |
making a more acurate mean
I'm working with a spreadsheet where we are tracking a few variables
that are later calculated into a mean. Generally there are alwats 5 variables in each mean, but every so often on of the conditions is not met so that cell returns "FALSE" or "#N/A". In those cases excel figures them as zeros in the mean. Is there a way to have excell recognise the occurance of a "FALSE" or "#N/A" and not bring it into the mean calculation? So if one of the 5 variables returns "FALSE" or "#N/A" I would like excell to do the mean based on the other 4 using a devisor of 4. Any ideas? |
making a more acurate mean
IF #N/A is in the range the result would be #N/A, if FALSE it would be
ignored =AVERAGE(Range) will ignore text and it will not be seen as zero -- Regards, Peo Sjoblom Excel 95 - Excel 2007 Northwest Excel Solutions www.nwexcelsolutions.com wrote in message oups.com... I'm working with a spreadsheet where we are tracking a few variables that are later calculated into a mean. Generally there are alwats 5 variables in each mean, but every so often on of the conditions is not met so that cell returns "FALSE" or "#N/A". In those cases excel figures them as zeros in the mean. Is there a way to have excell recognise the occurance of a "FALSE" or "#N/A" and not bring it into the mean calculation? So if one of the 5 variables returns "FALSE" or "#N/A" I would like excell to do the mean based on the other 4 using a devisor of 4. Any ideas? |
making a more acurate mean
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com