Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
Being a relative newcomer into the world of class modules, I’ve done a fair amount of reading on the subject (including postings in this group), and one keyword that always seems to pop up is “encapsulation”. While I can appreciate the reason for this, it leads me to a question about how rigorously encapsulation should be adhered to. In my case, I have an application containing a few class modules, 3 of which make calls to the same subroutine. I see 2 alternatives he 1 – Include the common code inside each class module, which seems inefficient, or 2 – Keep the subroutine outside the class modules, and lose encapsulation. Now, I have no doubt that my code is far from optimum, but it serves to illustrate the point. Is “encapsulation” simply a guideline to an ideal, or is it “written in stone”? I’d appreciate any comments/ advice on this. Thank you, Regards, DaveU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CLASS MODULE & SIMPLE MODULE | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Class Module vs Normal Module | Excel Programming | |||
using class module | Excel Programming | |||
Class module | Excel Programming | |||
Variable from a sheet module in a class module in XL XP | Excel Programming |