![]() |
Color Index
If a cell has no color index attached is it's Interior.ColorIndex -4142 for
everyone or can it be different on different computers? Thank you, Steven |
Color Index
Perhaps not for MACs.
Consider xlNone -- Gary''s Student - gsnu200789 "Steven" wrote: If a cell has no color index attached is it's Interior.ColorIndex -4142 for everyone or can it be different on different computers? Thank you, Steven |
Color Index
Hi Steve,
I believe that the constant is universal. However, as I have a badmemory, I use: xlNone. --- Regards. Norman "Steven" wrote in message ... If a cell has no color index attached is it's Interior.ColorIndex -4142 for everyone or can it be different on different computers? Thank you, Steven |
Color Index
Hi Gary,
My apologies! I failed to see your response when I posted. --- Regards. Norman |
Color Index
I think it is always better to use the built-in VB constants (such as
xlNone, vbLf, etc.) than the so called "magic numbers" (such as -4142, 10, etc.) as the built-in constants go a long way to making your code self-documenting. Rick "Norman Jones" wrote in message ... Hi Steve, I believe that the constant is universal. However, as I have a badmemory, I use: xlNone. --- Regards. Norman "Steven" wrote in message ... If a cell has no color index attached is it's Interior.ColorIndex -4142 for everyone or can it be different on different computers? Thank you, Steven |
Color Index
Hi Rick,
I always use the named constants (within Excel); my 'bad memory' was merely an artifice to render the implicit suggestion more palatable! --- Regards. Norman "Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB)" wrote in message ... I think it is always better to use the built-in VB constants (such as xlNone, vbLf, etc.) than the so called "magic numbers" (such as -4142, 10, etc.) as the built-in constants go a long way to making your code self-documenting. Rick |
Color Index
And my comments were not directed to you specifically, rather, they were
directed to the community at large (either within this thread or the archives)... your message was just a convenient 'vehicle' with which to make my point. Rick "Norman Jones" wrote in message ... Hi Rick, I always use the named constants (within Excel); my 'bad memory' was merely an artifice to render the implicit suggestion more palatable! --- Regards. Norman "Rick Rothstein (MVP - VB)" wrote in message ... I think it is always better to use the built-in VB constants (such as xlNone, vbLf, etc.) than the so called "magic numbers" (such as -4142, 10, etc.) as the built-in constants go a long way to making your code self-documenting. Rick |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com