Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear all
I am building a data checking tool using macros. We have one we currently use that I built directly in Excel using lookups, If statements etc, but the data range is so large and it is at the extent of complexity taking many minutes to recalc. So I have turned to trying to achieve the same task using macros instead.. Basically the way the macro works is to look up a code, using offsets it compares the value with some pre-determined values. If it finds an error it then lists the error onto another sheet and the user makes the correction in a third party system, reloads the data and rechecks. So far all seems OK.... My question is as follows:- Do I create lots of mini subs for each group of data tests I want to do and then call each of them from a primary sub or do I consecutively list each data test in fewer subs. Is there a performance impact. I think for ease of maintaining the code and future debugging etc it is better to break the subs into smaller sections but I bow to the knowlegable ones. Thanks in advance John |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
working out % of correctness gives #DIV/0! | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Subs | Excel Programming | |||
Sort subs | Excel Programming | |||
calling subs | Excel Programming | |||
Recursive Subs? | Excel Programming |