![]() |
Excel VBA dead ?
Here is an interesting recent job posting for a 6 month engagement:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Candidate will be responsible to provide ad-hoc reporting and analysis support to mid and Sr. management for internal and external IT performance metrics using Microsoft Excel ONLY. Expert level experience in MS Excel is required. However, no VBA is required and will not be used. In fact, VBA will be frowned upon if it is used. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems to me the only other alternative solution is VSTO/interopt ... using C# or VB.NET. All indications are that Microsoft is pushing in this direction as well....and away from VBA. Any comments ? |
Excel VBA dead ?
Well, I put a different interpretation on the ad. To me, it means no code at all is allowed. -- Jim Cone San Francisco, USA http://www.realezsites.com/bus/primitivesoftware "syswizard" wrote in message Here is an interesting recent job posting for a 6 month engagement: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Candidate will be responsible to provide ad-hoc reporting and analysis support to mid and Sr. management for internal and external IT performance metrics using Microsoft Excel ONLY. Expert level experience in MS Excel is required. However, no VBA is required and will not be used. In fact, VBA will be frowned upon if it is used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems to me the only other alternative solution is VSTO/interopt ... using C# or VB.NET. All indications are that Microsoft is pushing in this direction as well....and away from VBA. Any comments ? |
Excel VBA dead ?
Looks pretty odd to me: "expert level Excel" users presumably know when VBA
is appropriate and when not. Maybe some [misplaced] distrust of "macros" from a security standpoint ? Tim "syswizard" wrote in message oups.com... Here is an interesting recent job posting for a 6 month engagement: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Candidate will be responsible to provide ad-hoc reporting and analysis support to mid and Sr. management for internal and external IT performance metrics using Microsoft Excel ONLY. Expert level experience in MS Excel is required. However, no VBA is required and will not be used. In fact, VBA will be frowned upon if it is used. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seems to me the only other alternative solution is VSTO/interopt ... using C# or VB.NET. All indications are that Microsoft is pushing in this direction as well....and away from VBA. Any comments ? |
Excel VBA dead ?
I took it to mean they had some concerns over security and considered VBA a
threat. If it is necessary to extend Excels capabilities, then VBA is applicable. That's its intended purpose. If they need only relatively simple/straight forward support, then "no VBA is required" is reasonable. However, without knowing exactly what the expect, the statement that "VBA will be frowned upon if it is used" seems somewhat premature, especially considering the bells and whistles such users are apt to demand. They don't mention Macro4/dialogs though. They're not VBA <g. NickHK "syswizard" wrote in message oups.com... Here is an interesting recent job posting for a 6 month engagement: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Candidate will be responsible to provide ad-hoc reporting and analysis support to mid and Sr. management for internal and external IT performance metrics using Microsoft Excel ONLY. Expert level experience in MS Excel is required. However, no VBA is required and will not be used. In fact, VBA will be frowned upon if it is used. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Seems to me the only other alternative solution is VSTO/interopt ... using C# or VB.NET. All indications are that Microsoft is pushing in this direction as well....and away from VBA. Any comments ? |
Excel VBA dead ?
Well, VBA code can be useful for a "quick fix" in the few data
formatting scenarios where you need to do some kind of processing that you can't do with combination of worksheet functions, filtering, pivot tables, and so forth. But 99% of the time, when a "custom solution" is not required, programming won't be necessary for analysis, either. On Jun 4, 12:29 am, "NickHK" wrote: I took it to mean they had some concerns over security and considered VBA a threat. If it is necessary to extend Excels capabilities, then VBA is applicable. That's its intended purpose. If they need only relatively simple/straight forward support, then "no VBA is required" is reasonable. However, without knowing exactly what the expect, the statement that "VBA will be frowned upon if it is used" seems somewhat premature, especially considering the bells and whistles such users are apt to demand. They don't mention Macro4/dialogs though. They're not VBA <g. NickHK "syswizard" wrote in message oups.com... Here is an interesting recent job posting for a 6 month engagement: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Candidate will be responsible to provide ad-hoc reporting and analysis support to mid and Sr. management for internal and external IT performance metrics using Microsoft Excel ONLY. Expert level experience in MS Excel is required. However, no VBA is required and will not be used. In fact, VBA will be frowned upon if it is used. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Seems to me the only other alternative solution is VSTO/interopt ... using C# or VB.NET. All indications are that Microsoft is pushing in this direction as well....and away from VBA. Any comments ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Excel VBA dead ?
On Jun 4, 4:24 pm, syswizard wrote:
I'm trying to get a response from the original recruiter. Again, this is a very odd req ("ExpertExcelwithoutVBA" = oxymoron) and I would like to know the real reason behind the nixing ofVBA. I haven't seen anything done inExcelthat is impressive as a standalone application withoutVBA. I mean, to me, when specific requirements need to be met,VBAis 80% ofExcel. Well, the recruiter did not know anything (typical) and somehow the posted position got filled (poor sucker). Anyway, I am inclined to think that Excel development may be stagnating for several reasons relative to the new 2007 release: 1) No VBA improvements 2) No consideration for better code security 3) No architectural changes such as multi-threading 4) No speed improvements, in fact quite the opposite There is a small company that has introduced a Java-based spreadsheet that looks promising....fully programmable, and multi-threaded. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com