Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently upgraded an ActiveX EXE built in VB6 that is used by a few Excel
spreadsheets. I preserved binary compatibility when I compiled the project. I can use the ActiveX EXE without any problems (it queries our database) except in some cases where an existing spreadsheet that has a reference to it set when the old version of the EXE was around. We found one old XLS that didn't have a problem with the new EXE (which it shouldn't since the binary compatibility was preserved). But others give the error 430, which seems to go away if I drop the reference to the EXE, close and save the XLS, then re-open it an restore the reference. Is this a bug in Excel (version 2003)? Why would any XLS which is using a binary compatible ActiveX EXE complain but others would not? Is Excel caching something it shouldn't? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Getting an ActiveX error on save | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
ActiveX error message | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
ActiveX control error - | Excel Programming | |||
Error 50290: Error writing to Worksheet while using an ActiveX Control | Excel Programming | |||
Raise Error from ActiveX dll to VBA | Excel Programming |