![]() |
Collation inconsistencies
In a macro, .Sort should give results consistent with comparison operators;
in fact, that should be the default sort order. I finally sorted the data myself, with a bubble sort. Since it sorted based on comparison operators, I got what I wanted, but I wasted a lot of time trying, and failing, to use built-in methods. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...el.programming |
Collation inconsistencies
Whilst there are some inconsistencies in Excel's sort vs comparison
operators overall both systems work logically, ie likely to be of most use to most people most of the time. However there are also differences in comparison methods in Excel & VB/A. IOW a VB/A bubble sort will not compare in the same way as Excel's comparison operators with a variety of data types. Option Compare Text helps but not entirely. Regards, Peter T "Patricia Shannon" wrote in message ... In a macro, .Sort should give results consistent with comparison operators; in fact, that should be the default sort order. I finally sorted the data myself, with a bubble sort. Since it sorted based on comparison operators, I got what I wanted, but I wasted a lot of time trying, and failing, to use built-in methods. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...ault.aspx?mid= 39e5b01e-037c-4476-ac8c-536c9927d196&dg=microsoft.public.excel.programming |
Collation inconsistencies
Yes, I did have to format the areas I was working with as Text in order to
for my program to work right. "Peter T" wrote: Whilst there are some inconsistencies in Excel's sort vs comparison operators overall both systems work logically, ie likely to be of most use to most people most of the time. However there are also differences in comparison methods in Excel & VB/A. IOW a VB/A bubble sort will not compare in the same way as Excel's comparison operators with a variety of data types. Option Compare Text helps but not entirely. Regards, Peter T "Patricia Shannon" wrote in message ... In a macro, .Sort should give results consistent with comparison operators; in fact, that should be the default sort order. I finally sorted the data myself, with a bubble sort. Since it sorted based on comparison operators, I got what I wanted, but I wasted a lot of time trying, and failing, to use built-in methods. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...ault.aspx?mid= 39e5b01e-037c-4476-ac8c-536c9927d196&dg=microsoft.public.excel.programming |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com