Ditto...... and the response was for the OP to expand Jezebels' proposal. If
the code was truly pseudo in nature then it was mightily detailed in parts -
in fact one line away from working properly. I hope the OP benefited from
it.

--
Cheers
Nigel



"Norman Jones" wrote in message
...
Hi Jezebel,

I don't *need* to do anything. The code is obviously schematic. If you
really wanted to be pedantic you might point out that is needs to be
within
a Sub or Function, within a code module, and with some mechanism for
calling it. Or was your pomposity exhausted by that point?

The fact that the OP posed an elementary loop question might suggest that
your interpretation of obvious is rather optimistic.


At the risk of exposing myself to a possible charge of pomposity, I would
suggest that you use pseudo code only if there is good reason to believe
that this will be manifestly obvious to the intended recipient.
Additionally, in order to preclude responses such as Nigel's or, worse,
confusing the OP, it might be wise make an appropriate disclaimer at the
head of schematic code.



---
Regards,
Norman