Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially
do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
says... I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. Depends. On how the array formula is structured, how many of them are there, and how the UDF is written. It also possible -- and often is when the designer uses array formulas solely to create overly complex formulas -- to improve the design of a worksheet by *not* using array formulas. -- Regards, Tushar Mehta www.tushar-mehta.com Excel, PowerPoint, and VBA add-ins, tutorials Custom MS Office productivity solutions |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
Array formulas are usually faster than UDFs. HTH, Bernie MS Excel MVP "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The overhead involved in UDFs nearly always means that native functions
are faster. See http://www.decisionmodels.com/optspeed.htm for tips on speeding things up. In article . com, "Steve" wrote: I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
99% chance that the array formulas will be faster than UDF's. If you have the
need for speed sumproduct formulas are a little faster than array formulas. Here is a link... http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.SUMPRODUCT.html -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Steve" wrote: I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Worksheet functions, even array worksheet functions, will invariably be
faster than a UDF. -- HTH RP (remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct) "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And you may find that a pivottable would be faster than both.
Steve wrote: I have a spreadsheet where I use a lot of array formulas to essentially do a bunch of "SUM IFing". I am wondering in general if this method calculates faster than were I to create some user defined functions instead. Thanks. -- Dave Peterson |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which is faster sum(if) as an array or sumproduct? | New Users to Excel | |||
Can faster CPU+larger/faster RAM significantly speed up recalulati | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Using AND function within an array formula | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
IF function with Array Formula | Excel Programming | |||
Loading Excel Array from VB Array Faster | Excel Programming |