![]() |
Concatenate
Hi Everyone,
I have a Workbook that Contains About 50 Worksheets. Within those 50 Worksheets I have in the Region of 10,000 Formulas that Contain the Concatenate Function. Is it Better for Example to Use a Formula Like ... =Concatenate(A1,B1,C1,D1,E1,F1) OR ... =A1&B1&C1&D1&E1&F1 The First One is Obviously Easier to Interpret, But is there a Price to Pay with Regard to Calculation Time for Example. Thanks in Advance. All the Best. Paul |
Concatenate
Hi Again,
Has Anybody got Any Comments One Way Or Another on this Please. All the Best. Paul Paul Black wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a Workbook that Contains About 50 Worksheets. Within those 50 Worksheets I have in the Region of 10,000 Formulas that Contain the Concatenate Function. Is it Better for Example to Use a Formula Like ... =Concatenate(A1,B1,C1,D1,E1,F1) OR ... =A1&B1&C1&D1&E1&F1 The First One is Obviously Easier to Interpret, But is there a Price to Pay with Regard to Calculation Time for Example. Thanks in Advance. All the Best. Paul |
Concatenate
I don't know if there's a calculation time difference, but I like the
=a1&b1&c1 version. It's less typing and it doesn't use a function. So I don't need to have to worry about exceeding the limit of 7 nested functions limit. Paul Black wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a Workbook that Contains About 50 Worksheets. Within those 50 Worksheets I have in the Region of 10,000 Formulas that Contain the Concatenate Function. Is it Better for Example to Use a Formula Like ... =Concatenate(A1,B1,C1,D1,E1,F1) OR ... =A1&B1&C1&D1&E1&F1 The First One is Obviously Easier to Interpret, But is there a Price to Pay with Regard to Calculation Time for Example. Thanks in Advance. All the Best. Paul -- Dave Peterson |
Concatenate
Hi Paul,
Like Dave, I use the second (non Concatenate) form. FWIW, in limited testing, running each through series of 10^6 loops, the Concatenate method appeared to be aproximately 30% slower. --- Regards, Norman "Paul Black" wrote in message oups.com... Hi Again, Has Anybody got Any Comments One Way Or Another on this Please. All the Best. Paul Paul Black wrote: Hi Everyone, I have a Workbook that Contains About 50 Worksheets. Within those 50 Worksheets I have in the Region of 10,000 Formulas that Contain the Concatenate Function. Is it Better for Example to Use a Formula Like ... =Concatenate(A1,B1,C1,D1,E1,F1) OR ... =A1&B1&C1&D1&E1&F1 The First One is Obviously Easier to Interpret, But is there a Price to Pay with Regard to Calculation Time for Example. Thanks in Advance. All the Best. Paul |
Concatenate
Thanks for the Replies Dave & Norman,
I was Just Curious as my Spreadsheet Seems to take a Long time to Calculate. Although as I said, my Spreadsheet does have Many Sheets and Quite a Few Thousand Concatenate Formulas. It is also about 45 Meg in Size. I Personally do like the Format of Using "Concatenate" as it Makes it Easier to Read for me. I will try Changing a Couple of Sheets to the "&" Format and see if there is an Increase in Calculation Speed. Thankyou Both Again. All the Best. Paul |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com