![]() |
Sorting with variable number of sort fields
Hi
Anyone come up with an efficient way of sorting data based on variable number of sort fields at runtime? For example, if end-user wants to sort data on column 1, code is straighttforward: myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,1) However, if end-user can sort on upto 2 columns, say column x, and y, code gets clunky: if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) Now if end-user can sort on upto 3 columns, say x, y, z the code gets even more clunky. if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) else if (user specified columnx and y and z) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y), key3=Cells(1,z) Is there a better solution? Thanks |
Sorting with variable number of sort fields
Here is a possible work around:
Sub Macro1() Dim v1 As Variant, v2 As Variant Dim v3 As Variant v1 = "" v2 = "" v3 = "" Set v1 = Range("C1") Range("A1:F28").Sort Key1:=v1, Order1:=xlAscending, _ Key2:=v2, Order2:=xlAscending, _ Key3:=v3, Order3:=xlAscending, _ Header:=xlGuess, OrderCustom:=1, _ MatchCase:=False, Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _ DataOption1:=xlSortNormal, _ DataOption2:=xlSortNormal End Sub Leave V2 and V3 or just V3 as equal to "" if you don't want to sort on them. Otherwise set them to a range. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "BW" wrote in message ... Hi Anyone come up with an efficient way of sorting data based on variable number of sort fields at runtime? For example, if end-user wants to sort data on column 1, code is straighttforward: myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,1) However, if end-user can sort on upto 2 columns, say column x, and y, code gets clunky: if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) Now if end-user can sort on upto 3 columns, say x, y, z the code gets even more clunky. if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) else if (user specified columnx and y and z) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y), key3=Cells(1,z) Is there a better solution? Thanks |
Sorting with variable number of sort fields
Thanks Tom, that works great!
"Tom Ogilvy" wrote: Here is a possible work around: Sub Macro1() Dim v1 As Variant, v2 As Variant Dim v3 As Variant v1 = "" v2 = "" v3 = "" Set v1 = Range("C1") Range("A1:F28").Sort Key1:=v1, Order1:=xlAscending, _ Key2:=v2, Order2:=xlAscending, _ Key3:=v3, Order3:=xlAscending, _ Header:=xlGuess, OrderCustom:=1, _ MatchCase:=False, Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _ DataOption1:=xlSortNormal, _ DataOption2:=xlSortNormal End Sub Leave V2 and V3 or just V3 as equal to "" if you don't want to sort on them. Otherwise set them to a range. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "BW" wrote in message ... Hi Anyone come up with an efficient way of sorting data based on variable number of sort fields at runtime? For example, if end-user wants to sort data on column 1, code is straighttforward: myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,1) However, if end-user can sort on upto 2 columns, say column x, and y, code gets clunky: if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) Now if end-user can sort on upto 3 columns, say x, y, z the code gets even more clunky. if (user specified column x only) then myRange.Sort key1:=.Cells(1,x) else if (user specified column x and y) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y) else if (user specified columnx and y and z) then myRange.Sort key1:=Cells(1,x), key2:=Cells(1,y), key3=Cells(1,z) Is there a better solution? Thanks |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com