| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Intersect Operator vs Explicit Cell References and the Dependency
Currently I am trying to improve performance on one of my excel apps. In
this app I use the intersect operator and ranges, rather than using explicit cell references. Intersect: (DataRange Column1) * (DataRange Column2) Explicit: (A1) * (B1) If I look at dependencies of one of the cells in a range that I use in the intesects, it shows a dependency of all the formulas that reference that range. Is this a real dependecy? Am I incurring quite a bit of overhead when using intersects? Where do babies come from? Any thoughts would be appreciated! Regards |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Change operator from cell value | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
| convert relative cell references to absolute cell references via amacro? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Can I absolute cell an operator: and/or | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| How to rename references from range names to cell references | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| how to get the intersect cell data out using vba or function | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Threaded Mode
