![]() |
detect empty cell
I have haggled w/ this forever it seems. I want a universal (old and new
excel versions) way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything. in excel2000, ...if cells(i,j) < 0 then... worked, but it didn't work in an earlier version (I think 97). ....if application.isempty(cells(i,j)) then... doesn't work, but ...if isempty(cells(i,j)) then... works in 2000. This is interesting b/c I have come across instances where putting 'application' in front of a command allows it to work in 97, while it worked either way in 2000. If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version of excel the user has and regardless of whether I am looking for text or numbers or anything else. Is there a sure-fire way to accomplish this? thanks, mike allen |
detect empty cell
use:
not isempty(Range("a1")) or Range("a1")<"" ..value is optional as it's the default property of the range keepITcool < email : keepitcool chello nl (with @ and .) < homepage: http://members.chello.nl/keepitcool "mike allen" wrote: I have haggled w/ this forever it seems. I want a universal (old and new excel versions) way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything. in excel2000, ...if cells(i,j) < 0 then... worked, but it didn't work in an earlier version (I think 97). ...if application.isempty(cells(i,j)) then... doesn't work, but ...if isempty(cells(i,j)) then... works in 2000. This is interesting b/c I have come across instances where putting 'application' in front of a command allows it to work in 97, while it worked either way in 2000. If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version of excel the user has and regardless of whether I am looking for text or numbers or anything else. Is there a sure-fire way to accomplish this? thanks, mike allen |
detect empty cell
I've always used "if(len(cells(i,j))=0"
Stan "mike allen" wrote in message ... I have haggled w/ this forever it seems. I want a universal (old and new excel versions) way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything. in excel2000, ...if cells(i,j) < 0 then... worked, but it didn't work in an earlier version (I think 97). ...if application.isempty(cells(i,j)) then... doesn't work, but ...if isempty(cells(i,j)) then... works in 2000. This is interesting b/c I have come across instances where putting 'application' in front of a command allows it to work in 97, while it worked either way in 2000. If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version of excel the user has and regardless of whether I am looking for text or numbers or anything else. Is there a sure-fire way to accomplish this? thanks, mike allen |
detect empty cell
run this and never do it again.. ..although it IS fractional:)
Sub ff() Dim t!, i&, b As Boolean t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = IsEmpty(Cells(1, 1)) Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "e" t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = Cells(1, 1) = "" Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "-" t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = Len(Cells(1, 1)) = 0 Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "L" End Sub keepITcool < email : keepitcool chello nl (with @ and .) < homepage: http://members.chello.nl/keepitcool "Stan Scott" wrote: I've always used "if(len(cells(i,j))=0" Stan "mike allen" wrote in message ... I have haggled w/ this forever it seems. I want a universal (old and new excel versions) way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything. in excel2000, ...if cells(i,j) < 0 then... worked, but it didn't work in an earlier version (I think 97). ...if application.isempty(cells(i,j)) then... doesn't work, but ...if isempty(cells(i,j)) then... works in 2000. This is interesting b/c I have come across instances where putting 'application' in front of a command allows it to work in 97, while it worked either way in 2000. If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version of excel the user has and regardless of whether I am looking for text or numbers or anything else. Is there a sure-fire way to accomplish this? thanks, mike allen |
detect empty cell
That assumes the cells are really empty. The time difference is hardly
significant enough to warrant "never do it again" and len(trim(cells(1,1)) is more robust in situations where people clear cells with a spacebar. Just another opinion. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "keepITcool" wrote in message ... run this and never do it again.. ..although it IS fractional:) Sub ff() Dim t!, i&, b As Boolean t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = IsEmpty(Cells(1, 1)) Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "e" t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = Cells(1, 1) = "" Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "-" t = Timer For i = 1 To 100000 b = Len(Cells(1, 1)) = 0 Next Debug.Print Timer - t, "L" End Sub keepITcool < email : keepitcool chello nl (with @ and .) < homepage: http://members.chello.nl/keepitcool "Stan Scott" wrote: I've always used "if(len(cells(i,j))=0" Stan "mike allen" wrote in message ... I have haggled w/ this forever it seems. I want a universal (old and new excel versions) way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything. in excel2000, ...if cells(i,j) < 0 then... worked, but it didn't work in an earlier version (I think 97). ...if application.isempty(cells(i,j)) then... doesn't work, but ...if isempty(cells(i,j)) then... works in 2000. This is interesting b/c I have come across instances where putting 'application' in front of a command allows it to work in 97, while it worked either way in 2000. If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version of excel the user has and regardless of whether I am looking for text or numbers or anything else. Is there a sure-fire way to accomplish this? thanks, mike allen |
detect empty cell
"Tom Ogilvy" wrote:
That assumes the cells are really empty. THIS was the question: "way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything." The time difference is hardly significant enough to warrant "never do it again" I said "..although it IS fractional:)" the smiley was there for a reason... len(trim(cells(1,1)) is more robust in situations where people clear cells with a spacebar. Just another opinion. When testing for empty or 'spaced' cells, your solution is (as always) impeccable <vbg keepITcool < email : keepitcool chello nl (with @ and .) < homepage: http://members.chello.nl/keepitcool |
detect empty cell
Not to be argumentative, but
the real question was "If I don't see anything in the cell, I expect it to detect this empty field and skip over it, regardless of what version" your quote referred to peripheral information -- the fact that he could be looking at cells that contain anything. So if it looks empty, regardless of what it contains, treat it as empty. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy "keepITcool" wrote in message ... "Tom Ogilvy" wrote: That assumes the cells are really empty. THIS was the question: "way to see if a cell has anything in it. It may be text, number, or anything." The time difference is hardly significant enough to warrant "never do it again" I said "..although it IS fractional:)" the smiley was there for a reason... len(trim(cells(1,1)) is more robust in situations where people clear cells with a spacebar. Just another opinion. When testing for empty or 'spaced' cells, your solution is (as always) impeccable <vbg keepITcool < email : keepitcool chello nl (with @ and .) < homepage: http://members.chello.nl/keepitcool |
detect empty cell
I did something similar to this recently, and I just used Do Until:
Do Until len(Activecell.Value)<1 'Your Code Loop It should probably work across all versions. cheer -- Message posted from http://www.ExcelForum.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com