Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello. I'm trying to create a function in Excel that will populate empty
cells with a value. I have a file, which is imported from another system that contains the details of operators that have signed on to a specific checkout in the retail store in which I work, this file is in Excel format. The imported list contains about 13000 rows, each one containing the name of the operator that signed on. It looks like this: Checkout Number Operator Number Operator Name 1 123 A Cashier 124 B Cashier 125 C Cashier 126 D Cashier 2 127 E Cashier 128 F Cashier 129 G Cashier 3 130 H Cashier etc etc. As you can see, the imported data does not contain the checkout number in every row which I would like it to do. Each week, when I run a new report for the previous week, the number of rows for each checkout is different, dependant on who's signed on that week. Could anybody help with providing a formula that I can run in a macro that will populate the checkout number for me that doesn't require me to specify the range myself of where checkout 1 ends and checkout 2 starts? With my limited knowledge of macros, I'm finding this really hard. I feel sure I need to use a loop, but there are several sorts, and I don't know which sort to use or how to go about it. To further complicate the issue, the system that I import the data from shows the same cashier against the same checkout a number of times, as it captures *each* sign-on rather than just consolidating all the sign-ons to one cashier. For instance, B Cashier could sign on to checkout 2 18 times during the week, and this is what is making the number of rows so huge. I would also like to be able to run a macro to remove the duplicates in the operator name field on each checkout, so that in effect even though B Cashier has signed on to checkout 1 a lot of times, it still shows that they have signed onto checkout 2 a number of times also. I realise that this sort of thing maybe better controlled in Access, but we do not have Access installed at work and we will not be getting it either. I work for a national company and all their PC's are built to the same specification and have the same functions installed on them. There is also no hope of changing the system where the imported data originates as again, this is a vanilla system and cannot be modified. I really hope that someone can help...I know its possible, but just can't even begin to think how to do it effectively! Kind Regards Rob. |