LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,236
Default Sub vs Function

Something that I've always been curious about, but never found a real reason
behind.

Why do we use a Sub instead of using a Function?

Is there any reason other than a Sub returns nothing?

These both do exactly the same thing:

Function Test()
MsgBox "test"
End Function

Sub Test()
MsgBox "test"
End Sub

At the moment my opinion is that Sub is redundant and may as well never be
used.

Thoughts? Comments?


--
Rob van Gelder - http://www.vangelder.co.nz/excel



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
copy of excel file not showing formulal/function in the function b oaallam Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 4 September 6th 07 01:20 PM
LINKEDRANGE function - a complement to the PULL function (for getting values from a closed workbook) [email protected] Excel Worksheet Functions 0 September 5th 06 03:44 PM
Offset function with nested match function not finding host ss. MKunert Excel Worksheet Functions 1 March 21st 06 10:46 PM
Emulate Index/Match combo function w/ VBA custom function Spencer Hutton Excel Worksheet Functions 2 May 2nd 05 05:26 PM
Adding a custom function to the default excel function list DonutDel Excel Programming 3 November 21st 03 03:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"