![]() |
Dealing with errors
Does anyone know whether there is a neat way to deal with a formula
whose result may be "error" without using the "iserror" function and effectively having to write the formula twice. For example, the construct I use currently is =IF(ISERROR(my formula),"n/a",my formula). This requires me to enter my formula twice which is redundant. |
Dealing with errors
it is painful but you can use a shortened version of long formulas to test
for error I am sure you are aware you can cut and paste in the formula bar,not so painful then -- paul remove nospam for email addy! " wrote: Does anyone know whether there is a neat way to deal with a formula whose result may be "error" without using the "iserror" function and effectively having to write the formula twice. For example, the construct I use currently is =IF(ISERROR(my formula),"n/a",my formula). This requires me to enter my formula twice which is redundant. |
Dealing with errors
On 19 Mar 2006 01:37:45 -0800, "
wrote: Does anyone know whether there is a neat way to deal with a formula whose result may be "error" without using the "iserror" function and effectively having to write the formula twice. For example, the construct I use currently is =IF(ISERROR(my formula),"n/a",my formula). This requires me to enter my formula twice which is redundant. It depends on what you want to happen if there is an error. If you just want to hide the error message, you could use conditional formatting and format the font the same as the background color if the cell contains an error (Formula Is: =iserr(cell_ref) Sometimes, if you understand why there is an error result, you can simplify the formula. For example, you might be able to test just for the presence of a single value in a single cell, rather than repeat the entire formula. --ron |
Dealing with errors
MS has heard you.
http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/search.aspx?q=iferror&p=1 " wrote: Does anyone know whether there is a neat way to deal with a formula whose result may be "error" without using the "iserror" function and effectively having to write the formula twice. For example, the construct I use currently is =IF(ISERROR(my formula),"n/a",my formula). This requires me to enter my formula twice which is redundant. -- Dave Peterson |
Dealing with errors
Thanks Dave, yes, it does seem that MSFT is onto this in XL12. Hope it
will convert all my existing double-barrelled ISERROR formulae into nice neat IFERROR formulae. What do you think the chances are? |
Dealing with errors
I wouldn't guess that existing =if(iserror(),"",()) would be converted. But
that's just my guess. But you could post a question on that blog. " wrote: Thanks Dave, yes, it does seem that MSFT is onto this in XL12. Hope it will convert all my existing double-barrelled ISERROR formulae into nice neat IFERROR formulae. What do you think the chances are? -- Dave Peterson |
Dealing with errors
None, because ISERROR will still be around.
-- HTH Bob Phillips (remove nothere from email address if mailing direct) wrote in message oups.com... Thanks Dave, yes, it does seem that MSFT is onto this in XL12. Hope it will convert all my existing double-barrelled ISERROR formulae into nice neat IFERROR formulae. What do you think the chances are? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com