![]() |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives error
i am running excell 2003 and am trying to use the quotient function.
I have found the ms help on the web and even copied and pasted the example but all i get is an error. It is like my version of excel doesnt have the quotient function at all, it isnt listed in the list of functions locally but i get lots of refs to it here at MS office site? Help Please |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives error
It is part of the Analysis ToolPak Add-In. To Install this:
Select Tools Then Add-Ins... Check the box next to Analysis TookPak Click OK Re-enter your formula (or recalculate 'F9') If you don't see the Analysis ToolPak as an option, then you need to reinstall it from your Office CD. HTH, Elkar "Chris Whitehead" wrote: i am running excell 2003 and am trying to use the quotient function. I have found the ms help on the web and even copied and pasted the example but all i get is an error. It is like my version of excel doesnt have the quotient function at all, it isnt listed in the list of functions locally but i get lots of refs to it here at MS office site? Help Please |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives error
Why would you want to use:
=quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Just curious. Chris Whitehead wrote: i am running excell 2003 and am trying to use the quotient function. I have found the ms help on the web and even copied and pasted the example but all i get is an error. It is like my version of excel doesnt have the quotient function at all, it isnt listed in the list of functions locally but i get lots of refs to it here at MS office site? Help Please -- Dave Peterson |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
"Dave Peterson" wrote:
Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Isn't quotient(a1,b1) more like roundown(a1/b1,0) than int(a1/b1)? The difference seems to arise when a1/b1 is negative, for example -10/3. |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
Not sure, i am a bit new to this i just need the full integer and not the
rest for one part of the formula and i need the remainder (MOD) for the rest "Dave Peterson" wrote: Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Just curious. Chris Whitehead wrote: i am running excell 2003 and am trying to use the quotient function. I have found the ms help on the web and even copied and pasted the example but all i get is an error. It is like my version of excel doesnt have the quotient function at all, it isnt listed in the list of functions locally but i get lots of refs to it here at MS office site? Help Please -- Dave Peterson |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
|
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
I think I'd use =int() or =trunc() instead to get that quotient, though.
Chris Whitehead wrote: Not sure, i am a bit new to this i just need the full integer and not the rest for one part of the formula and i need the remainder (MOD) for the rest "Dave Peterson" wrote: Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Just curious. Chris Whitehead wrote: i am running excell 2003 and am trying to use the quotient function. I have found the ms help on the web and even copied and pasted the example but all i get is an error. It is like my version of excel doesnt have the quotient function at all, it isnt listed in the list of functions locally but i get lots of refs to it here at MS office site? Help Please -- Dave Peterson -- Dave Peterson |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
And it may just boil down to what the OP wants--no matter what =quotient(),
=int() and =trunc() return. But I think it's good that you showed the difference. wrote: "Dave Peterson" wrote: Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Isn't quotient(a1,b1) more like roundown(a1/b1,0) than int(a1/b1)? The difference seems to arise when a1/b1 is negative, for example -10/3. -- Dave Peterson |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
Hi. Just 2 cents. The primary definition of Quotient is Floor (x)
http://functions.wolfram.com/IntegerFunctions/Quotient In math, Quotient (-5,3) returns -2, but Excel returns -1. It's hard to tell where the problem is with Excel because Floor (-2.5) returns -3 in math programs, but Excel rounds towards 0 and returns -2. Excel operates "a little differently" shall we say. Again...just 2 cents. -- HTH. :) Dana DeLouis Windows XP, Office 2003 " wrote in message ... "Dave Peterson" wrote: Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Isn't quotient(a1,b1) more like roundown(a1/b1,0) than int(a1/b1)? The difference seems to arise when a1/b1 is negative, for example -10/3. |
quotient function prob. i have copied example but it gives err
"Dave Peterson" wrote: I think I'd use =int() or =trunc() instead to get that quotient, though. Chris Whitehead wrote: Not sure, i am a bit new to this i just need the full integer and not the rest for one part of the formula and i need the remainder (MOD) for the rest "Dave Peterson" wrote: Why would you want to use: =quotient(a1,b1) instead of =int(a1/b1) Quotient function in excel is rather buggy: given d=divisior, D=dividend; Q=quotient; R=rest d D Q R 5 10 0 5 -5 10 -0 5 5 -10 -0 -5 -5 -10 0 -5 Apart the very funny invention of the concept of -0 in excel, now if we apply the rule d=D*q+r we get that is verified only for the first and the fourth expression not for the second and the third. Forget about quotient Also for the math definition of rest 0<=R<|D| so R should always be 0 But that is a long time bug, probably correcting it will break compatibility with a lot of spreadsheets. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com