Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A little bird told me that in Excel12 the maximum number of nested IF
statements will increase from 7 to 64 making it possible to write a really scary cell formula. Is Microsoft encouraging sloppy worksheet practice? Ed Ferrero http://www.edferrero.com |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't know about any little birds - you can get the straight scoop from
http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/default.aspx where indeed MS announced that nesting is increased to 64 levels. MS isn't encouraging anything in terms of worksheet practice. It's responding to demands from the purchasers of their product. There are any number of announced improvements that will give sloppy users enough rope to hang themselves. I'm betting that the first "XL is too slow at calculating my 1,000,000 rows of VLOOKUP()s" will be posted here within a week of the release. In article , "Ed Ferrero" wrote: A little bird told me that in Excel12 the maximum number of nested IF statements will increase from 7 to 64 making it possible to write a really scary cell formula. Is Microsoft encouraging sloppy worksheet practice? |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi JE McGimpsey,
Don't know about any little birds - you can get the straight scoop from http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/default.aspx where indeed MS announced that nesting is increased to 64 levels. MS isn't encouraging anything in terms of worksheet practice. It's responding to demands from the purchasers of their product. So where do Microsoft find users who demand things like this? The Never Used Excel Before Yesterday (NUEBY) focus group? :) Thanks for the blog URL BTW. Ed Ferrero http://www.edferrero.com |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it comes from a giant population of:
"Since all I have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" focus group. Lots of people want to use excel as a word processor, database, presentation system, file manager, .... Ed Ferrero wrote: Hi JE McGimpsey, Don't know about any little birds - you can get the straight scoop from http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/default.aspx where indeed MS announced that nesting is increased to 64 levels. MS isn't encouraging anything in terms of worksheet practice. It's responding to demands from the purchasers of their product. So where do Microsoft find users who demand things like this? The Never Used Excel Before Yesterday (NUEBY) focus group? :) Thanks for the blog URL BTW. Ed Ferrero http://www.edferrero.com -- Dave Peterson |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cute acronym.
Note, though, that some people have been using XL for years the same way they did the first day, and would probably feel quite comfortable with 30 nested IFs rather than having to learn the vagaries of VLOOKUP. This is especially true of those that use the function wizard to keep track of their parentheses rather than doing it by hand. One needn't feel entirely superior to them - the tool works for their purpose, and they haven't wasted a lot of time learning more than they need to. In article , "Ed Ferrero" wrote: So where do Microsoft find users who demand things like this? The Never Used Excel Before Yesterday (NUEBY) focus group? :) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excel nested IF formula question | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Nested Subtotals in Excel 2002 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Why are my nested sub-totals are displaying incorrectly? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Nested IF statements | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
7+ nested if statement? | Excel Worksheet Functions |