Upgrading Excel with technical features for engineers, please
 

I would like to see much more technical features in excel. I am studying for
structural engineer and I make models with excel. But the program doesn't
have enough features to make good models, think about mechanics (and showing
its specifics graphs) and physics calculations which got to do with
structures.

So make us an "technical excel" for structural and hydraulic engineering

New students don't have mathematics anymore, the have to make models with
excel nowadays!!! ;)

best regards



----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...lic.excel.misc

I would be interested in more details as to what you want to do.
I expect Excel can already do most things.
--
Bernard V Liengme
www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme
remove caps from email

"structural and hydraulic engineers" <structural and hydraulic
wrote in message
...

I would like to see much more technical features in excel. I am studying
for
structural engineer and I make models with excel. But the program doesn't
have enough features to make good models, think about mechanics (and
showing
its specifics graphs) and physics calculations which got to do with
structures.

So make us an "technical excel" for structural and hydraulic engineering

New students don't have mathematics anymore, the have to make models with
excel nowadays!!! ;)

best regards



----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...lic.excel.misc

While I wouldn't mind seeing more engineering functions in XL (though
there are professional add-ins that include engineering functions), I
would like a disclaimer placed on any structure or system designed in XL:

"This structure/system was designed using Microsoft Excel. In the
Excel license agreement, Excel's manufacturer explicitly denies that
Excel is fit for any use whatsoever, and doesn't warrant that its
results are correct. The engineer who used this was either uneducated,
sloppy or ignorant. Enter/use at your own risk."



In article ,
"structural and hydraulic engineers" <structural and hydraulic
wrote:

I would like to see much more technical features in excel. I am studying for
structural engineer and I make models with excel. But the program doesn't
have enough features to make good models, think about mechanics (and showing
its specifics graphs) and physics calculations which got to do with
structures.

So make us an "technical excel" for structural and hydraulic engineering

New students don't have mathematics anymore, the have to make models with
excel nowadays!!! ;)

<< ... New students don't have mathematics anymore, the have to make
models with excel nowadays!!! ;)


How can one be a good engineer without any sound mathematical
background? So, what happens if the system crashes ... there is no
Excel to depend on and the reports are due before they know it?

Without any sound mathematical background, these so-called new
students/engineers who do not have mathematics anymore won't even know
how to differentiate/integrate functions required in basic engineering
calculations.

They might not even know how to plot a simple graph in an X-Y plane.

How sad :-(((

... just my very humble opinion.


--
BenjieLop


------------------------------------------------------------------------
BenjieLop's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php...o&userid=11019
View this thread: http://www.excelforum.com/showthread...hreadid=384167