![]() |
Lookup Tables with linked sheets
Hi
I have a lookup table that is on a seperate workbook to where the function is (they are kinked). The lookup will only return results up to row 593. Is there a limit to the amount of rows you can have in a lookup. It looks in a named range is it because there is a limit on this?? Please help!! Cheers Jo |
My first bet is your named range isn't what you want it to be. If you look at
Insert|Name|Define and inspect your range name, do you see what you expect? Jo Davis wrote: Hi I have a lookup table that is on a seperate workbook to where the function is (they are kinked). The lookup will only return results up to row 593. Is there a limit to the amount of rows you can have in a lookup. It looks in a named range is it because there is a limit on this?? Please help!! Cheers Jo -- Dave Peterson |
Hi Dave
Thanks for your resonse Yes the named range is the same, i have decided to use an index match formula instead now, i am still wondering if there is a limit to how many rows you have have within a look up. "Dave Peterson" wrote: My first bet is your named range isn't what you want it to be. If you look at Insert|Name|Define and inspect your range name, do you see what you expect? Jo Davis wrote: Hi I have a lookup table that is on a seperate workbook to where the function is (they are kinked). The lookup will only return results up to row 593. Is there a limit to the amount of rows you can have in a lookup. It looks in a named range is it because there is a limit on this?? Please help!! Cheers Jo -- Dave Peterson |
I don't think so. There may be some long calculation times when you have lots
of rows (and lots of formulas). But I would bet that =index(match()) suffers the same problem. Jo Davis wrote: Hi Dave Thanks for your resonse Yes the named range is the same, i have decided to use an index match formula instead now, i am still wondering if there is a limit to how many rows you have have within a look up. "Dave Peterson" wrote: My first bet is your named range isn't what you want it to be. If you look at Insert|Name|Define and inspect your range name, do you see what you expect? Jo Davis wrote: Hi I have a lookup table that is on a seperate workbook to where the function is (they are kinked). The lookup will only return results up to row 593. Is there a limit to the amount of rows you can have in a lookup. It looks in a named range is it because there is a limit on this?? Please help!! Cheers Jo -- Dave Peterson -- Dave Peterson |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com