Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excel2003 ...
My understanding is ... an array "Index/Match" Formula calculates faster than a "VLookup" Formula ... If so, then I would like to use "Index/Match". Also, I often do use "Index/Match" as the Index can be either R or L of target cell. Issue ... with 2 Cols of 40,000 records ... Index/Match Formula fails to copy all the way down the 2nd Col ... It seems to fail @ about 20,000 records down the 2nd Col (one clarifier ... I am on the same WorkSheet ... adjacent Cols) Above said ... Am I up against an "Index/Match" constraint here ... or ... as is generally the case ... Is this an oversight on my part? Please enlighten me ... Thanks for the guidance ... Kha |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vlookup or Index/Match | New Users to Excel | |||
VLOOKUP vs INDEX and MATCH | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
index Match, or Vlookup Match.. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Need Help with Index and Match or Vlookup | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Index Match Vlookup or something else | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |