![]() |
Cell displays #'s incorrectly
In Excel 2003, I have cells formatted to display with 0 decimal places. The
formula in the cell evaluates to a number with many decimals (=10/9), and displays correctly (1) unless the width is less than 60 pixels. Then it fills the cell with #'s. In the font I'm using, the cell should display correctly down to 12 pixels. Other cells that evaluate to whole numbers display correctly. I'd prefer not to have to have cells wide enough to display all the fractional numbers if I only want 0 decimals. Is there a solution or is this just "one of those Excel things"? -- --------------------------- PJ in (stormy) Fla |
Cell displays #'s incorrectly
The decimal point need some space. So I can have 12 display OK but 1.1
displays # when I make the cell very narrow. Not much one can do (from cool Nova Scotia ---- 'cool' as in low °C) -- Bernard V Liengme Microsoft Excel MVP http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme remove caps from email "PJ in Fla" wrote in message ... In Excel 2003, I have cells formatted to display with 0 decimal places. The formula in the cell evaluates to a number with many decimals (=10/9), and displays correctly (1) unless the width is less than 60 pixels. Then it fills the cell with #'s. In the font I'm using, the cell should display correctly down to 12 pixels. Other cells that evaluate to whole numbers display correctly. I'd prefer not to have to have cells wide enough to display all the fractional numbers if I only want 0 decimals. Is there a solution or is this just "one of those Excel things"? -- --------------------------- PJ in (stormy) Fla |
Cell displays #'s incorrectly
Bernard,
Thanks for the reply. Note the difference in "displaying OK but too wide" to "should display OK in narrow cell but doesn't" is 60 pixels vs. 12 pixels. Big difference of 48 pixels. Excel can display 7 "#" characters (#######) in the cell but can't display "1" correctly. If the answer is "That's the way Excel works" then I think this is a bug in Excel. The display routing should be determining the formatting of the cell's value before generating the display of the cell to see if the *FORMATTED* result displays correctly before throwing up it's hands and stuffing "######" in the field. Since it doesn't apparently do that, IMHO that is a mistake in the display processing of the cells. -- --------------------------- PJ (living with Excel bugs) in (sunny and warm) Fla "Bernard Liengme" wrote: The decimal point need some space. So I can have 12 display OK but 1.1 displays # when I make the cell very narrow. Not much one can do (from cool Nova Scotia ---- 'cool' as in low °C) -- Bernard V Liengme Microsoft Excel MVP http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme remove caps from email "PJ in Fla" wrote in message ... In Excel 2003, I have cells formatted to display with 0 decimal places. The formula in the cell evaluates to a number with many decimals (=10/9), and displays correctly (1) unless the width is less than 60 pixels. Then it fills the cell with #'s. In the font I'm using, the cell should display correctly down to 12 pixels. Other cells that evaluate to whole numbers display correctly. I'd prefer not to have to have cells wide enough to display all the fractional numbers if I only want 0 decimals. Is there a solution or is this just "one of those Excel things"? -- --------------------------- PJ in (stormy) Fla |
Cell displays #'s incorrectly
Well, after I cleared ALL formats from the cells and reapplied "Number, 0
decimal places" formatting, the numbers display as expected. I have no idea how the original formatting was applied, or what was applied. I received the spreadsheet from someone else. I guess this is a solution, so if it ain't broke, don't fix it! -- --------------------------- (puzzled but working) PJ in (sunny and HOT) Fla "PJ in Fla" wrote: Bernard, Thanks for the reply. Note the difference in "displaying OK but too wide" to "should display OK in narrow cell but doesn't" is 60 pixels vs. 12 pixels. Big difference of 48 pixels. Excel can display 7 "#" characters (#######) in the cell but can't display "1" correctly. If the answer is "That's the way Excel works" then I think this is a bug in Excel. The display routing should be determining the formatting of the cell's value before generating the display of the cell to see if the *FORMATTED* result displays correctly before throwing up it's hands and stuffing "######" in the field. Since it doesn't apparently do that, IMHO that is a mistake in the display processing of the cells. -- --------------------------- PJ (living with Excel bugs) in (sunny and warm) Fla "Bernard Liengme" wrote: The decimal point need some space. So I can have 12 display OK but 1.1 displays # when I make the cell very narrow. Not much one can do (from cool Nova Scotia ---- 'cool' as in low °C) -- Bernard V Liengme Microsoft Excel MVP http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme remove caps from email "PJ in Fla" wrote in message ... In Excel 2003, I have cells formatted to display with 0 decimal places. The formula in the cell evaluates to a number with many decimals (=10/9), and displays correctly (1) unless the width is less than 60 pixels. Then it fills the cell with #'s. In the font I'm using, the cell should display correctly down to 12 pixels. Other cells that evaluate to whole numbers display correctly. I'd prefer not to have to have cells wide enough to display all the fractional numbers if I only want 0 decimals. Is there a solution or is this just "one of those Excel things"? -- --------------------------- PJ in (stormy) Fla |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com