![]() |
Applying a rating scale to numerical measurements
I have two lists of data that i need to graph. An example is given below.
Project Ref Investment/Beneficiary in $ Efficiency Rating 1 87.3 2.3 2 156.6 3.8 3 185.8 3.8 4 8250.0 3.0 5 1164000.0 1.8 6 1500000.0 2.1 7 2812000.0 1.6 8 21462700.0 1.7 The Efficiency column represents the results of a survey on quality using a rating scale of 1-4 with 1 being poor and 4 good for each project. We now want to graph the relationship of efficiency with the investment per beneficiary that each project received.Ideally we want our data in a matrix with the Project references as data labels. This will help us identify projects with lets say high Investmement and poor efficiency. Because the scales are so different (refer to project 8 compared to the others) we thought it would be easier to apply the same scale 1-4 for the Investment/Beneficiary results. How do you apply a rating scale to a list of numbers so that "proportional" representation is ensured? Is this the right thing to do with the data above? |
Applying a rating scale to numerical measurements
I think your problem has to do with the wide variances in the dollar coloum.
You may want to use a LOG plot and take the log of the dollars rather than the dollar amounts. There doesn't seem to be a good correlattion between the Investment and effiency and don't see the value in make this comparison. Maybe you really want is the return in the investment rather than the investment itself. "GeorgiaK" wrote: I have two lists of data that i need to graph. An example is given below. Project Ref Investment/Beneficiary in $ Efficiency Rating 1 87.3 2.3 2 156.6 3.8 3 185.8 3.8 4 8250.0 3.0 5 1164000.0 1.8 6 1500000.0 2.1 7 2812000.0 1.6 8 21462700.0 1.7 The Efficiency column represents the results of a survey on quality using a rating scale of 1-4 with 1 being poor and 4 good for each project. We now want to graph the relationship of efficiency with the investment per beneficiary that each project received.Ideally we want our data in a matrix with the Project references as data labels. This will help us identify projects with lets say high Investmement and poor efficiency. Because the scales are so different (refer to project 8 compared to the others) we thought it would be easier to apply the same scale 1-4 for the Investment/Beneficiary results. How do you apply a rating scale to a list of numbers so that "proportional" representation is ensured? Is this the right thing to do with the data above? |
Applying a rating scale to numerical measurements
You see these are ruralwater projects boreholes etc. Value is assessed based
on how many beneficiaries you have reached and we are trying to assess the performance of the organisations delivering. We tried to develope some KPI such as cost per capita gross and net but dont see how you calculate return on your investment for projects like this. Is a matrix a more appropriate way of presenting it maybe? quadrants could maybe help show some trend by clustering? Your help greatly appreciated. "Joel" wrote: I think your problem has to do with the wide variances in the dollar coloum. You may want to use a LOG plot and take the log of the dollars rather than the dollar amounts. There seem to be a good correlattion between the Investment and effiency and don't see the value in make this comparison. Maybe you really want is the return in the investment rather than the investment itself. "GeorgiaK" wrote: I have two lists of data that i need to graph. An example is given below. Project Ref Investment/Beneficiary in $ Efficiency Rating 1 87.3 2.3 2 156.6 3.8 3 185.8 3.8 4 8250.0 3.0 5 1164000.0 1.8 6 1500000.0 2.1 7 2812000.0 1.6 8 21462700.0 1.7 The Efficiency column represents the results of a survey on quality using a rating scale of 1-4 with 1 being poor and 4 good for each project. We now want to graph the relationship of efficiency with the investment per beneficiary that each project received.Ideally we want our data in a matrix with the Project references as data labels. This will help us identify projects with lets say high Investmement and poor efficiency. Because the scales are so different (refer to project 8 compared to the others) we thought it would be easier to apply the same scale 1-4 for the Investment/Beneficiary results. How do you apply a rating scale to a list of numbers so that "proportional" representation is ensured? Is this the right thing to do with the data above? |
Applying a rating scale to numerical measurements
I don't know if quandrant are going to give better results because I don't
know how you would define quandrants. Is there a way to classify projects into different categories? I do think clustering by projects by Investment size (range of dollar value) will give betterresults than what you are presently seeing. Try project less than 10,000; 10,000 - 1,000,000; over 1,000,000 (or similar groupings). "GeorgiaK" wrote: You see these are ruralwater projects boreholes etc. Value is assessed based on how many beneficiaries you have reached and we are trying to assess the performance of the organisations delivering. We tried to develope some KPI such as cost per capita gross and net but dont see how you calculate return on your investment for projects like this. Is a matrix a more appropriate way of presenting it maybe? quadrants could maybe help show some trend by clustering? Your help greatly appreciated. "Joel" wrote: I think your problem has to do with the wide variances in the dollar coloum. You may want to use a LOG plot and take the log of the dollars rather than the dollar amounts. There seem to be a good correlattion between the Investment and effiency and don't see the value in make this comparison. Maybe you really want is the return in the investment rather than the investment itself. "GeorgiaK" wrote: I have two lists of data that i need to graph. An example is given below. Project Ref Investment/Beneficiary in $ Efficiency Rating 1 87.3 2.3 2 156.6 3.8 3 185.8 3.8 4 8250.0 3.0 5 1164000.0 1.8 6 1500000.0 2.1 7 2812000.0 1.6 8 21462700.0 1.7 The Efficiency column represents the results of a survey on quality using a rating scale of 1-4 with 1 being poor and 4 good for each project. We now want to graph the relationship of efficiency with the investment per beneficiary that each project received.Ideally we want our data in a matrix with the Project references as data labels. This will help us identify projects with lets say high Investmement and poor efficiency. Because the scales are so different (refer to project 8 compared to the others) we thought it would be easier to apply the same scale 1-4 for the Investment/Beneficiary results. How do you apply a rating scale to a list of numbers so that "proportional" representation is ensured? Is this the right thing to do with the data above? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com