ExcelBanter

ExcelBanter (https://www.excelbanter.com/)
-   Excel Discussion (Misc queries) (https://www.excelbanter.com/excel-discussion-misc-queries/)
-   -   Calculation Efficiency (Speed)? (https://www.excelbanter.com/excel-discussion-misc-queries/163451-calculation-efficiency-speed.html)

Ken

Calculation Efficiency (Speed)?
 
Excel2003 ...

3 WorkSheets ... WS1, WS2 & WS3 ... Cols A:F ... all contain the same
respective Values returned by the same Index/Match Formula pegged to Cols in
WS4. This the result of copying WS2 & WS3 once I had WS1 working.

Rather than leaving the Index/Match Formulas on WS2 & WS3 ... Is it easier
for Excel to calculate if I use Index/Match Formula on WS1 only ... & then
use "equal" Formulas (Links) from WS2 & WS3 to WS1 as in options below:

1: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Index/Match WS4 ... WS3 Index/Match WS4
2: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS1
3: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS2
4: or other?

What is the most efficient way to say up ... for Excel to calculate this
condition?

Thanks ... Kha





JE McGimpsey

Calculation Efficiency (Speed)?
 
It would be far more efficient to include the reference/link than to
repeat the INDEX/MATCH functions.

In article ,
Ken wrote:

Excel2003 ...

3 WorkSheets ... WS1, WS2 & WS3 ... Cols A:F ... all contain the same
respective Values returned by the same Index/Match Formula pegged to Cols in
WS4. This the result of copying WS2 & WS3 once I had WS1 working.

Rather than leaving the Index/Match Formulas on WS2 & WS3 ... Is it easier
for Excel to calculate if I use Index/Match Formula on WS1 only ... & then
use "equal" Formulas (Links) from WS2 & WS3 to WS1 as in options below:

1: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Index/Match WS4 ... WS3 Index/Match WS4
2: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS1
3: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS2
4: or other?

What is the most efficient way to say up ... for Excel to calculate this
condition?

Thanks ... Kha


Ken

Calculation Efficiency (Speed)?
 
Thank you ... I am on it ... Kha

"JE McGimpsey" wrote:

It would be far more efficient to include the reference/link than to
repeat the INDEX/MATCH functions.

In article ,
Ken wrote:

Excel2003 ...

3 WorkSheets ... WS1, WS2 & WS3 ... Cols A:F ... all contain the same
respective Values returned by the same Index/Match Formula pegged to Cols in
WS4. This the result of copying WS2 & WS3 once I had WS1 working.

Rather than leaving the Index/Match Formulas on WS2 & WS3 ... Is it easier
for Excel to calculate if I use Index/Match Formula on WS1 only ... & then
use "equal" Formulas (Links) from WS2 & WS3 to WS1 as in options below:

1: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Index/Match WS4 ... WS3 Index/Match WS4
2: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS1
3: WS1 Index/Match WS4 ... WS2 Equal Links WS1 ... WS3 Equal Links WS2
4: or other?

What is the most efficient way to say up ... for Excel to calculate this
condition?

Thanks ... Kha




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com