Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
What is more efficient
Do it make any difference having the following equation:
=($I4=$G$4)*SUMPRODUCT(--($I4-$G$4:$G4=0),(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4)):$R$1043,$C$3:$C3)+($I4$G$4)*SUMPRODUCT(($I4-$G$3:$G4),--($I4-$G$3:$G40),--($G$4:$G5-$I40),(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4-1)):$R$1043)+($I4<$G$4)*($I4*(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4-1))) In one cell - or three cells defined below? =($I4=$G$4)*SUMPRODUCT(--($I4-$G$4:$G4=0),(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4)):$R$1043,$C$3:$C3) +($I4$G$4)*SUMPRODUCT(($I4-$G$3:$G4),--($I4-$G$3:$G40),--($G$4:$G5-$I40),(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4-1)):$R$1043) +($I4<$G$4)*($I4*(INDIRECT("R"&1044-$A4-1))) I think that for auditing purposes three cells would be easier - but did not know if there would be any other advantage splitting the equation up into three cells - and then combining the answer. Note the equation could be copied down 2600 times. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Most efficient formula/combining multiple data cell ranges/seperat | New Users to Excel | |||
more efficient way to lookup a range? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
recently used files, more efficient | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
something more efficient that =IF, and sytax questions | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel Randoming Becoming More Efficient | Excel Worksheet Functions |