![]() |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is
obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
It is 'wrong' because the value of y=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e if very sensitive
to the values of the confinements (a, b,....) You could format the trendline and get more precision and then very carefully copy the values OR you could you LINEST as shown at http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/ExcelTips/Polynomial.htm best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
I understand what you are saying and fully agree, but that is not the issue.
The equation is just flat wrong UNLESS you set the intercept =0. But doing that makes the line not fit as well. Any thoughts? Thanks for your time. "Bernard Liengme" wrote: It is 'wrong' because the value of y=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e if very sensitive to the values of the confinements (a, b,....) You could format the trendline and get more precision and then very carefully copy the values OR you could you LINEST as shown at http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/ExcelTips/Polynomial.htm best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
I apologize- I was wrong- I took every number out to SIX decimal places and
calculated...my answer went from 241 to 94.4 (correct). A bunch of engineers and we did not think it would make that kind of difference. Thanks for the help "jkeith" wrote: I understand what you are saying and fully agree, but that is not the issue. The equation is just flat wrong UNLESS you set the intercept =0. But doing that makes the line not fit as well. Any thoughts? Thanks for your time. "Bernard Liengme" wrote: It is 'wrong' because the value of y=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e if very sensitive to the values of the confinements (a, b,....) You could format the trendline and get more precision and then very carefully copy the values OR you could you LINEST as shown at http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/ExcelTips/Polynomial.htm best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
Send me (my private email) a sample file with the data.
best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... I understand what you are saying and fully agree, but that is not the issue. The equation is just flat wrong UNLESS you set the intercept =0. But doing that makes the line not fit as well. Any thoughts? Thanks for your time. "Bernard Liengme" wrote: It is 'wrong' because the value of y=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e if very sensitive to the values of the confinements (a, b,....) You could format the trendline and get more precision and then very carefully copy the values OR you could you LINEST as shown at http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/ExcelTips/Polynomial.htm best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
I took every number out to SIX decimal places and
Hi. It's a known "feature." Chart trendline formula is inaccurate in Excel http://support.microsoft.com/kb/211967/en-us -- HTH :) Dana DeLouis Windows XP & Office 2003 "jkeith" wrote in message ... I apologize- I was wrong- I took every number out to SIX decimal places and calculated...my answer went from 241 to 94.4 (correct). A bunch of engineers and we did not think it would make that kind of difference. Thanks for the help "jkeith" wrote: I understand what you are saying and fully agree, but that is not the issue. The equation is just flat wrong UNLESS you set the intercept =0. But doing that makes the line not fit as well. Any thoughts? Thanks for your time. "Bernard Liengme" wrote: It is 'wrong' because the value of y=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e if very sensitive to the values of the confinements (a, b,....) You could format the trendline and get more precision and then very carefully copy the values OR you could you LINEST as shown at http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme/ExcelTips/Polynomial.htm best wishes -- Bernard V Liengme www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme remove caps from email "jkeith" wrote in message ... fitting a trendline to data and the polynomial equation it spits out is obviously wrong. Any ideas? thanks |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
Hi Dana,
The article you linked to says to set your number to 30 decimal places yet Excel will only display precision to 15 significant digits. Is this a situation where Excel will calculate to a higher precision but only display to the limits? Is it sort of like a cell only displaying 1024 characters even though it will accept and use a greater amount of data? Also, if that is the case, what is the limit of decimals. Thanks Martin |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
Hello, MartinW!
You wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:42:22 +1000: M The article you linked to says to set your number to 30 M decimal places yet Excel will only display precision to 15 M significant digits. M Is this a situation where Excel will calculate to a higher M precision but only display to the limits? M Is it sort of like a cell only displaying 1024 characters M even though it will accept and use a greater amount of data? M Also, if that is the case, what is the limit of decimals. From HELP on precision. 15 digit precision Excel stores and calculates with 15 significant digits of precision. Excel calculates stored, not displayed, values The displayed, and printed, value depends on how you choose to format and display the stored value. James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.comcast.not |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
Hi. I think the 30 digits is to allow one to see all the digits using the
basic Number format. If you format a cell with the Number format, and use the scroll button, you are limited to 30 digits. I think this is what the article was referring to. For example, if you enter the following number: =123456789012345*(1E-30) and use the number format out to 30 digits, you will be able to see all the digits. (Under Number format). So again, the article seems to suggest using the Number Format, and the Number format seems limited to 30 Digits. (as seen from the scroll buttons). What's funny is that the toolbar button "Increase Decimal" can override this limitation. -- HTH :) Dana DeLouis Windows XP & Office 2003 "MartinW" wrote in message ... Hi Dana, The article you linked to says to set your number to 30 decimal places yet Excel will only display precision to 15 significant digits. Is this a situation where Excel will calculate to a higher precision but only display to the limits? Is it sort of like a cell only displaying 1024 characters even though it will accept and use a greater amount of data? Also, if that is the case, what is the limit of decimals. Thanks Martin |
excel generated polynomial equation is wrong
Thanks Dana and James,
It was just curiosity on my part. 15 digits provides a lot more precision than I will ever need. Regards Martin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com