combination side by side and stacked
am trying in '07 to get 3 series to be side by side columns and 3 others to
be side by side with the first three, but stacked themselves. In other words, 3 of them are large and important, and 3 are getting drowned out in the scaling. This on top of the fact that the width, per period, for all 6 to be side by side, is excessive and makes the graph difficult. So I want to put 3 on top of each other to show the aggregate effect (with divisions, not as one total), and the larger three as single columns themselves (to make sure the trend of each is seen on its own. As I try to change the chart type for just one of the series, it converts the whole graph one way or another (either to all stacked, or all side by side). Any suggestions. Thx. -- Boris |
combination side by side and stacked
Try one of these examples:
http://peltiertech.com/Excel/ChartsH...sterStack.html - Jon ------- Jon Peltier, Microsoft Excel MVP Tutorials and Custom Solutions Peltier Technical Services, Inc. - http://PeltierTech.com _______ "BorisS" wrote in message ... am trying in '07 to get 3 series to be side by side columns and 3 others to be side by side with the first three, but stacked themselves. In other words, 3 of them are large and important, and 3 are getting drowned out in the scaling. This on top of the fact that the width, per period, for all 6 to be side by side, is excessive and makes the graph difficult. So I want to put 3 on top of each other to show the aggregate effect (with divisions, not as one total), and the larger three as single columns themselves (to make sure the trend of each is seen on its own. As I try to change the chart type for just one of the series, it converts the whole graph one way or another (either to all stacked, or all side by side). Any suggestions. Thx. -- Boris |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com