If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




Calculating age of death
Hi
I work in a hospital and have to calculate what exact age someone is when they die. I have birth date and date of death. How can I calculate in total the age on death. Example, 45 years, 4 months and 5 days Many thanks  Kind regards Ann Shaw 
Ads 
#2




Calculating age of death
Maybe
=DATEDIF(A1,A2,"y")&" y "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"ym")&" m "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"md")&" d" Where a1= DOB a2 = DOD Mike H "Annie" wrote: > Hi > I work in a hospital and have to calculate what exact age someone is when > they die. I have birth date and date of death. How can I calculate in total > the age on death. Example, 45 years, 4 months and 5 days > > Many thanks > > >  > Kind regards > > Ann Shaw 
#3




Calculating age of death
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:30:02 0800, Mike H >
wrote: >Maybe > >=DATEDIF(A1,A2,"y")&" y "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"ym")&" m "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"md")&" d" > >Where a1= DOB >a2 = DOD > >Mike H Since this is in a hospital, and the result probably going on some kind of legal document, I think you need to have the legal definition of "age" for this purpose. Some odd results arise with that formula when it is used for this kind of determination: DOB: 31 Jan 1943 DOD: 01 Mar 2008 Your Formula: 65 y 1 m 1 d ron 
#4




Calculating age of death
>>Maybe
>> >>=DATEDIF(A1,A2,"y")&" y "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"ym")&" m "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"md")&" >>d" >> >>Where a1= DOB >>a2 = DOD > > Since this is in a hospital, and the result probably going on some kind of > legal document, I think you need to have the legal definition of "age" for > this > purpose. > > Some odd results arise with that formula when it is used for this kind of > determination: > > DOB: 31 Jan 1943 > DOD: 01 Mar 2008 > > Your Formula: 65 y 1 m 1 d I've always thought measuring a time span using years, months and days is somewhat useless as the months part is not a very definitive increment. The number of days spanned by some number of months differs depending on the months being spanned. Hell, even years can be somewhat problematic give the occurrence of leap years within time spans; but, when used by itself as a "rough" indicator of time span, this if fine; however, the accuracy implied by specifying a time span in years, months and days has always bothered me (way more so than simply specifying years and days, even though I recognize the inaccuracy introduced by the leap years here). Rick 
#5




Calculating age of death
<way more so than simply specifying years and days,>
Indeed. Financial (and actuarial, my area of interest) systems often use this. But because product specifications often *do* refer to months, the 360day system is somewhat popular in those groups. Not that it's perfect! It assumes a 360day year, consisting of 12 30day months. As you can imagine, the remaining 5 or 6 days are subject to lots of different interpretations, but AFAIK they boil down to 2 systems; NASD or European (see HELP for DAYS360). If only customers would specify what "number of months difference" means (to them).....  Kind regards, Niek Otten Microsoft MVP  Excel "Rick Rothstein (MVP  VB)" > wrote in message ...  >>Maybe  >>  >>=DATEDIF(A1,A2,"y")&" y "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"ym")&" m "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"md")&"  >>d"  >>  >>Where a1= DOB  >>a2 = DOD  >  > Since this is in a hospital, and the result probably going on some kind of  > legal document, I think you need to have the legal definition of "age" for  > this  > purpose.  >  > Some odd results arise with that formula when it is used for this kind of  > determination:  >  > DOB: 31 Jan 1943  > DOD: 01 Mar 2008  >  > Your Formula: 65 y 1 m 1 d   I've always thought measuring a time span using years, months and days is  somewhat useless as the months part is not a very definitive increment. The  number of days spanned by some number of months differs depending on the  months being spanned. Hell, even years can be somewhat problematic give the  occurrence of leap years within time spans; but, when used by itself as a  "rough" indicator of time span, this if fine; however, the accuracy implied  by specifying a time span in years, months and days has always bothered me  (way more so than simply specifying years and days, even though I recognize  the inaccuracy introduced by the leap years here).   Rick  
#6




Calculating age of death
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:02:14 0500, "Rick Rothstein \(MVP  VB\)"
> wrote: >>>Maybe >>> >>>=DATEDIF(A1,A2,"y")&" y "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"ym")&" m "&DATEDIF(A1,A2,"md")&" >>>d" >>> >>>Where a1= DOB >>>a2 = DOD >> >> Since this is in a hospital, and the result probably going on some kind of >> legal document, I think you need to have the legal definition of "age" for >> this >> purpose. >> >> Some odd results arise with that formula when it is used for this kind of >> determination: >> >> DOB: 31 Jan 1943 >> DOD: 01 Mar 2008 >> >> Your Formula: 65 y 1 m 1 d > >I've always thought measuring a time span using years, months and days is >somewhat useless as the months part is not a very definitive increment. The >number of days spanned by some number of months differs depending on the >months being spanned. Hell, even years can be somewhat problematic give the >occurrence of leap years within time spans; but, when used by itself as a >"rough" indicator of time span, this if fine; however, the accuracy implied >by specifying a time span in years, months and days has always bothered me >(way more so than simply specifying years and days, even though I recognize >the inaccuracy introduced by the leap years here). > >Rick In general I agree with you, but there are certain legal ramifications in certain areas, and, if clarified, can allow one to express a time span even with the inclusion of "months". For example, some kinds of aviation certifications are defined in terms of "calendar months". The meaning is clear (if you know the definition), but not something that can be computed (easily) using DATEDIF. ron 
#7




Calculating age of death
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:54:09 0800 (PST), joeu2004 > wrote:
>Your function returns "12 months" instead of "1 year" for the dates >2/29/1948 and 2/29/1949 (d1 and d2). I assume you mean 2/28/1949 for d2. But how to handle that situation is not entirely clear, and also gets into legalities. The most common instance has to do with when a leapling celebrates their birthday. But more important might be when a leapling is legally considered to have attained a certain age, e.g. that of legal majority. In the US I have read, but not been able to definitively document, that "most" states consider the leapling to have his/her birthday on Mar 1 of the common year. I have read that in England and Taiwan the leapling is considered to have his/her birthday on Feb 28 during common years. I think, for now, I will leave it at 12 months, and add a comment in the UDF that indicates it is UScentric. > >Without debugging your mistake, I think the implementation of the >output construction can be greatly simplfied, IMHO. See the revision >at the end below. I started using IIF's and even nested IIF's and found it easier to set up the array and let the Join function handle the <comma><space> delimiter. > >I was going to suggest using VBA DateDiff since that __is__ documented >in VBA Help and presumably supported. > >But it has some odd quirks, one of which is documented, to wit: "When >comparing December 31 to January 1 of the immediately succeeding year, >DateDiff for Year ("yyyy") returns 1 even though only a day has >elapsed". > >Actually, the same "round up" error arises when the start when the >interval is "m" (months). I avoided DateDiff because of the same uncertainty as how bulletproof it is. > >I did not bother to vet your Excel implementation. It uses similar logic to the UDF, but your example of 29Feb > 28Feb causes the month calculation to error; that is easily fixed by adding another month to the array: =MATCH(TRUE,EDATE(StartDt,C2*12+ROW(INDIRECT("1:13 ")))>EndDt,0)1 >'NOTE: It would be prudent for the type of DateIntvl >'to be Variant and return an appropriate CVErr() if >'d1>=d2 Good suggestion 
#8




Calculating age of death
On Mar 3, 7:26 pm, Ron Rosenfeld > wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:54:09 0800 (PST), joeu2004 > wrote: > > Your function returns "12 months" instead of "1 year" > > for the dates > > 2/29/1948 and 2/29/1949 (d1 and d2). > > I assume you mean 2/28/1949 for d2. Good "assumption". I said as much in my followup errata that I posted nearly 4.5 hours before your response. You wrote: > But how to handle that situation is not entirely clear, > and also gets into legalities. Non sequitur. My point was: your VBA function outputs "12 months", and I believe 12 months is synonymous with "1 year" in anyone's book. (Well, anyone that follows the socalled Western calendar. ;>) You wrote: > In the US I have read, but not been able to definitively > document, that "most" states consider the leapling to have > his/her birthday on Mar 1 of the common year. I have never heard or read of that in the US. On the contrary.... As the wiki page that you read states: "English law of 1256 decreed that in leap years, the leap day and the day before [...] are to be reckoned as one day for the purpose of calculating when a full year had passed. In England and Wales a person born on February 29 legally reaches the age of 18 or 21 on February 28 of the relevant year". English law before the US independence is called Common Law in the US. And Common Law, especially civil common law, is generally followed in the US unless there is statutory or constitutional law (including written case law) to the contrary. For example, Calif Civil Code section 22.2 says as much directly. (But I have not researched Calif law to see if it states anything different for the anniversary of Feb 29 per se.) The website http://www.leapyearday.com/driverslicenses.htm has several anecdotal stories where Feb 28 was recognized as the anniversary of a Feb 29 birth date by states. One writer states: "the Texas Department of Public Safety has since changed the format of the driver's license [...]. When my expiration date is not in a Leap Year, it shows as expiring on February 28th". I believe that US federal law uses Feb 28 as the anniversary of Feb 29 where applicable. But I would have to do a "fullcourt press" to do the legal research properly. As suggestive, albeit not dispositive evidence, note that the Truth In Lending Act, Appendix J states: "If a series of payments (or advances) is scheduled for the last day of each month, months shall be measured from the last day of the given month to the last day of another month. If payments (or advances) are scheduled for the 29th or 30th of each month, the last day of February shall be used when applicable". (But even if I could find dispositive of federal law, I am not saying that is binding on the states in areas that are not controlled by federal law.) But really, this issue is neither here nor there. I had simply noted at the outset that __my__ goal was to be consistent with EDATE, which does treat Feb 28 as the anniversary of Feb 29. And I wrote: "If you [sic] that is what you want, too, then do" the following. You do not have to agree with that goal. But then it seems odd that you rely on EDATE in your Excel formulation. And it seems odd that your VBA implementation returns 12 months. If your position is that Feb 28 is not 1 year after Feb 29, then I would expect your result to be 11 months 30 days, since "2/28/2009""1/29/2009" is 30. You wrote: > I started using IIF's and even nested IIF's and found it > easier to set up the array and let the Join function handle > the <comma><space> delimiter. If you want to use an array and Join, that's your prerogative. But your justification does not wash. You are using If...Then and IIf() exactly as I use them. You wrote ("reformatted to fit your screen"): If yr > 0 Then _ sOutput(0) = yr & IIf(yr = 1, " year", " years") If mnth > 0 Then _ sOutput(0  (yr > 0)) _ = mnth & IIf(mnth = 1, " month", " months") If dy > 0 Or (yr = 0 And mnth = 0) Then _ sOutput(0  (yr > 0)  (mnth > 0)) _ = dy & IIf(dy = 1, " day", " days") I wrote: If yr > 0 Then _ s = ", " & yr & IIf(yr = 1, " year", " years") If mnth > 0 Then _ s = s & ", " & mnth & IIf(mnth = 1, " month", " months") If dy > 0 Or (yr = 0 And mnth = 0) Then _ s = s & ", " & dy & IIf(dy = 1, " day", " days") There is nothing "easier" about your implementation with respect to IIf() and If...Then per se. Both of our implementations are identical in that respect. The only difference is that I append to string variable "s", then clip the first 2 characters (always ", "), whereas you allocate (Redim) array "sOutput0" and use Join to concatenate the sOutput0 components with a ", " separator. Obviously, which is "simpler" is subjective. That is why I wrote "IMHO". 
#9




Calculating age of death
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:39:13 0800 (PST), joeu2004 > wrote:
>Good "assumption". I said as much in my followup errata that I >posted nearly 4.5 hours before your response. And had I seen it before I posted mine, I would have mentioned it. Or did you bring this up for some other reason that would contribute to our discussion? >> In the US I have read, but not been able to definitively >> document, that "most" states consider the leapling to have >> his/her birthday on Mar 1 of the common year. > >I have never heard or read of that in the US. On the contrary.... The first below was cited in an article I read. The second is where I live. Haven't gone through any other legal research in the US. MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE http://www.legislature.mi.gov/%28S%2...ary%20AND%2029 257.4a “Birthday” defined. Sec. 4a. “Birthday” shall mean any anniversary of the original date of birth, and all persons born on February 29 shall be deemed, for the purposes of this act, to have been born on March 1.  Maine Motor Vehicle Code: http://www.mainelegislature.org/legi.../title29A.pdf 29A 1406. Expiration 3. Leap year birthday. For the purposes of this section, a person born on February 29th is deemed to have been born on March 1st.  >Non sequitur. My point was: your VBA function outputs "12 months", >and I believe 12 months is synonymous with "1 year" in anyone's book. Yes that is true, but in this one instance, I am uncertain how to treat that time interval. However, it is interesting that by using a previous version of my UDF, from 2006, (http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/hav...t2506504.html) which I subsequently "updated" by calculating "years" first, gives the "1 year" result. This version has not had the "prettied up" output: ======================================= Option Explicit Function DateIntvl2(d1 As Date, d2 As Date) As String Dim temp As Date Dim i As Double Dim yr As Long, mnth As Long, dy As Long Dim Yrstr As String, Mnstr As String, Dystr As String Do Until temp > d2 i = i + 1 temp = DateAdd("m", i, d1) Loop i = i  1 temp = DateAdd("m", i, d1) yr = Int(i / 12) mnth = i Mod 12 dy = d2  temp Yrstr = IIf(yr = 1, " yr ", " yrs ") Mnstr = IIf(mnth = 1, " month ", " months ") Dystr = IIf(dy = 1, " day", " days") DateIntvl2 = yr & Yrstr & mnth & Mnstr & dy & Dystr End Function ========================================= 
#10




Calculating age of death
On Mar 4, 4:12*am, Ron Rosenfeld > wrote:
> MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE *http://www.legislature.mi.gov/%28S%2...lsivns%29%29/m... > 257.4a Birthday defined. [....] > Maine Motor Vehicle Code: * *http://www.mainelegislature.org/legi.../title29A.pdf > 29A *1406. Expiration > 3. Leap year birthday. For the purposes of this section, > a person born on February 29th is deemed to have been born > on March 1st. Thanks for those citation. I guess I was wrong about how uniform the treatment of Feb 29 anniversaries is across the US. In any case, I reiterate: my goal was to be consistent with EDATE's handling of the Feb 29 anniversary, not with any particular laws. You wrote: > However, it is interesting that by using a previous version > of my UDF [...] gives the "1 year" result. So we seem to be in "violent agreement". Independent of how you choose to handle the Feb 29 anniversary (an unrelated issue), the point is: it is no more correct to output "12 months" instead of "1 year" from a routine that breaks down date intervals into year/month/days than it would be to output "60 minutes" instead of "1 hour" from a routine that breaks down time intervals into hour/minute/seconds. I do not believe the first implementation of your UDF presented in this thread returns "12 months" for any other start/end date pair. And IMHO, there is no rational reason to think that it should for the Feb29toFeb28 interval  to think that "12 months" has some special meaning specific to that unique circumstance. It is a simple defect  which is the only point I was trying to make originally. 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Cemetery birth and death date sort  Lorene Schertzl  Excel Discussion (Misc queries)  1  March 18th 06 04:32 AM 
bar graph showing year of birth and death of several people  Tom Gettys  Charts and Charting in Excel  3  September 5th 05 05:11 PM 
Calculating recurring date in following month, calculating # days in that period  Walterius  Excel Worksheet Functions  6  June 4th 05 11:21 PM 
calculating an age  rocket0612  Excel Discussion (Misc queries)  6  May 30th 05 11:35 AM 
Not Calculating?  Trevor J. Wilson  Excel Worksheet Functions  3  April 15th 05 03:14 AM 