Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know the definition of 3rd quartile and I know the formula in excel but
could not figure out how excel calculates it so I can explain it at my trial. My population is relatively small 1.22x, 1.12x, 3.11x and 0.85x. the median is 1.17x the 1st quartile is 1.05x and the 3rd quartile is 1.69x. I tried to figure out how excel calculates these quartiles when the population is not big enough. I really appreciate your help and thank you in advance. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Atanas -
Excel assigns cumulative relative frequency of zero to the minimum value of the data set and cumulative relative frequency of one to the maximum value. Intermediate values of the data set are assigned cumulative relative frequency in steps of 1/(n-1), where n is the number of values in the data set. To determine intermediate percentiles, Excel uses linear interpolation between two cumulative relative frequencies. For n=4, the four values are assigned cumulative relative frequencies 0.0, 0.33333..., 0.66666..., and 1.0. The 3rd quartile has cumulative relative frequency 0.75. The interpolation between your data values 1.22 and 3.11 is 1.22+(3.11-1.22)*(0.75-0.66667)/(1.0-0.66667) = 1.22+1.89*0.08333/0.33333 = 1.22+1.89*0.25 = 1.22+0.47 = 1.69. - Mike Middleton http://www.DecisionToolworks.com Decision Analysis Add-ins for Excel "Atanas" wrote in message ... I know the definition of 3rd quartile and I know the formula in excel but could not figure out how excel calculates it so I can explain it at my trial. My population is relatively small 1.22x, 1.12x, 3.11x and 0.85x. the median is 1.17x the 1st quartile is 1.05x and the 3rd quartile is 1.69x. I tried to figure out how excel calculates these quartiles when the population is not big enough. I really appreciate your help and thank you in advance. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:23:13 -0800 from Mike Middleton
: Excel assigns cumulative relative frequency of zero to the minimum value of the data set and cumulative relative frequency of one to the maximum value. Is that accurate? I should have thought cumulative relative frequency of the minimum number would be 1/N for a data set of N items. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ "If there's one thing I know, it's men. I ought to: it's been my life work." -- Marie Dressler, in /Dinner at Eight/ |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Brown -
I think my description of Excel's method is "accurate." But there are several ways to determine percentiles. I was only trying to describe Excel's method. Browse to www.google.com, and search for "percentile," or take a look at Wikipedia's entry. Personally, I prefer starting the cumulative relative frequencies at 1/(2*n) for the minimum value and using steps of 1/n up to 1-(1/(2*n)) for the maximum. (Justification: The minimum value represents the lower 1/n cumulative relative frequencies, so I associate the minimum value with the median cumulative relative frequency, i.e., 1/(2*n).) - Mike Middleton http://www.DecisionToolworks.com Decision Analysis Add-ins for Excel "Stan Brown" wrote in message ... Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:23:13 -0800 from Mike Middleton : Excel assigns cumulative relative frequency of zero to the minimum value of the data set and cumulative relative frequency of one to the maximum value. Is that accurate? I should have thought cumulative relative frequency of the minimum number would be 1/N for a data set of N items. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ "If there's one thing I know, it's men. I ought to: it's been my life work." -- Marie Dressler, in /Dinner at Eight/ |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This seems an odd way to do this, but apparantly there is no universally
accepted method for quartile so you can't say Excell is incorrect in doing it this way. I copied and pasted the following from http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/r.j.gerr...elfaq/faq.html If the data are assumed to be in ascending order, - the lower quartile (Q1) is the ¼(n+3)th observation - the second quartile (median) is the ½(n+1)th observation - the upper quartile (Q3) is the ¼(3n+1)th observation When ¼(n+3), ½(n+1) and ¼(3n+1) are not integers, linear interpolation is used. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
quartile, percentile, and blank cells | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Lookup to return count, median, lower quartile, upper quartile&ave | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
New method for PERCENTILE & QUARTILE formulas | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Auto Filter and Quartile/Percentile Functions | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Quartile Function | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |